It is as vivid today as it if happened last week. But it was ten years ago. Today. Prince Rogers Nelson died. Gone. Silenced. Forever. And by that evening I am sitting in the breakfast nook of my kitchen on a writing jag fueled by memory and grief, disbelief and anger, agony and plain shock It turns out in retrospect to be the purest of my writing. It is the one I bring out once a year, on this day, for now, shit, ten years, and still try to fathom. I can’t. I don’t expect to. Too soon. Not him. Not now. Prince died. Fuck. And my deadline loomed. Cover story. Write the requested eulogy. Just me. I’d written about Prince many times for the Aquarian Weekly. This was the plan. Because they’d sent me to a press-only Artist Formally Known as Prince event in 1997 at the Roseland Ballroom. I’m the guy to do it, my editor said. Little did he know. Little did my readers know, it was personal. And that’s how I started.
Ten years ago, somewhere in the late afternoon, I received an email from my sister-in-law, Shannon. Prince died. What? Although the news was shocking, and it was still a developing international story, it made sense it came from her. Shannon and I had shared Prince’s music at nearly every family gathering by then for nearly twenty years. Her sister, my beloved wife, is also a fan, but it was always Shannon who insisted we blast Purple Rain at certain periods of long weekends and would request a Prince song or five when we’d all inevitably be dancing around the living room with or without the kids. Shannon had to be the one to alert me.
Soon after, I received a text from my dear friend and drummer from my 1980s band, Anthony, who also shared in real-time those classic Prince and the Revolution songs and albums from the period – much of which I cover in my most recent release, Revolution – Prince, the Band, the Era.
Not long after, the call came for me to put down the shock and sadness I felt. Try and frame what Prince’s art had meant to me when music was my livelihood, and I held onto his genius, his madness, his dynamic presence as much as I could as a creative and later understood its impact further as a music writer. Moreover, I had to voice the anguish of millions of Prince fans. I had to dig deep. I had to mourn, it turns out, my youth. That is what the Boomers told me when John Lennon was murdered. Their youth was slain. They grew up with him, he spoke to them, he became a voice, an architype for their generation. Gunned down at forty. Distant memories of a time when the music mattered more than bills, taxes, commuting, the usual adult shit. Obliterated.
And so, I wrote about this and kept writing. I eventually just gave out and sent it to press by midnight, and it was widely read – on the cover – less than a week later. But I didn’t read it, would not read it, at least until the one-year anniversary when it dawned on me that I did, in fact, write about me in the thing. There’s stuff about Prince in there, of course, but this was ultimately a requiem to youth and how music takes us there and makes us think of those who were there too, who remember it all as if it were still happening because that is what good music does, what it always does and should always do. It is part of our DNA – our present and our past – what I have based my 300 Favorite Albums podcast on, that magical elixir of nostalgia meets immediacy. It is magic.
And Prince was, after all, a magician, and he never let us forget it. He was always on – the fashion, the sounds, the mystical mumbles that seemed to be prophetic and unhinged, as were the lyrics that were alien guideposts of a clarity unknown.
But enough of this rant. Why not unearth this cover piece one more time? Why not let this free-form regurgitation out of its cage once more? Okay. Sure. Below is what I wrote that day, and what I barely edited, because I didn’t want to write it much less read it. And although I still wince at its brutal, raw-boned honesty about my own sorrow, it still makes sense to me. Maybe it will to you.
Seventy years ago, this spring (March 23, 1956), RCA Victor released the self-titled debut album from a twenty-one-year-old rockabilly crooner from Memphis Tennessee named Elvis Presley. Within the month it would reach the top of the U.S. charts, the first such feat for what certain deejays around the country were calling rock and roll. Elvis Presley Rock n’ Roll, as it was titled in the UK, subsequently topped the charts there. No one knows the first rock and roll record for sure. Some say “Rocket 88” by Jackie Brenston and his Delta Cats, which was Ike Turner’s Kings of Rhythm in disguise due to contractual obligations, the year before. Still other music historians point to earlier recordings that more than hint at a similar driving backbeat style in Sister Rosetta Tharpe’s “Strange Things Happening Every Day” (1944), Roy Brown’s “Good Rockin’ Tonight” (1947), a song Presley recorded as one of his first sides in 1954, and Goree Carter’s “Rock Awhile” (1949). But we do know for sure that Elvis Presley heralded this new music into the apex of popularity.
If anyone challenges the well-worn moniker King of Rock and Roll for Elvis, something I have done on more than one occasion, this is one factoid you can point to in his defense.
By the spring of 1956, Elvis was on a precipitous rise similar to Frank Sinatra’s a generation earlier – a stronghold on the fascination of the youth market, specifically women. Beyond his voice, however, Presley’s spastic movements on stage, a raw sexually charged combination of Beale Street shimmying and Baptist Church gyrations he picked up as a kid from the Black communities around Tupelo, Mississippi, set the course for his success on stages across the South. From the seismic release of his first single, “That’s All Right,” a sparkling boogie cover of bluesman, Authur Crudup’s 1946 hit, Presley came on as a naive hybrid sensation – a mish-mosh of country-blues-gospel-swing in an unfiltered package. Produced at Sun Records in Memphis by Sam Phillips, who spent years promoting Black acts like Howlin’ Wolf, Rufus Thomas, and B.B. King among others (Phillips cut “Rocket 88”), the song’s infectious rhythm, created by just Elvis on acoustic guitar, Bill Black on bass and Scottie Moore on guitar, shook the music industry to its core.
It was Phillips’s invention of the famed slap-back reverb sound that when combined with Elvis’s youthful yip-yelp phrasing, easing in and out of falsetto into a smooth timbre, backed ably with the groove of those instruments, which charted wholly new musical realms. Phillips would go onto record 24 revolutionary tracks at Sun with Elvis’s trio (and eventually foursome with D.J. Fontana on drums) between 1954 and 1955, ten of which he released on five two-sided singles. Then Elvis signed with the notorious Colonel Tom Parker, and when the big New York City labels came calling, the former carny huckster convinced RCA to pony up 40-grand (around 490-grand today) for Elvis’s Sun contract and back catalog by the end of ‘55.
Ten days into the new year, Elvis, along with Scotty, Bill and D.J., aka the Blue Moon Boys, convened at the Methodist Television, Radio and TV Studios in Nashville, Tennessee to begin recording their first RCA tracks. On day one, they completed arguably the most important and groundbreaking records of the 20th century, “Heartbreak Hotel.” With assistance from legendary Nashville session cats, guitarist Chet Atkins and pianist, Floyd Cramer, the single was awash in echo, a desperate attempt to recreate what Sam Phillips had wrought on all of Elvis’s best Sun recordings. This inadvertently gave “Heartbreak Hotel” an eerie moaning, almost mystical quality – Elvis sings as if facing his mortality in infinite loneliness. Seventeen days later it was on the radio, in stores, and being played across the Pond to thousands of teenagers like John Lennon, Paul McCartney, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, who snapped into Beatles and Rolling Stones in its wake as if hit by a bolt of beatific lighting.
“Heartbreak Hotel,” penned by Nashville songwriters, Mae Boren Axton and Tommy Durden (Elvis was given credit – thanks, Colonel) from a suicide note published in the Miami Herald, obliterated culture, creating a firestorm across the universe and making Elvis Presley one of the most photographed, filmed, and written-about humans on the planet from that week forward.
By that point, Elvis Presley was pretty much in the can, as the Blue Moon Boys and a tireless Elvis cruised through seven tracks in the remaining weeks of January after cutting “Heartbreak Hotel.” Five more songs previously tracked by Phillips filled out the long player (sans the single), which was rushed out a mere two months later to a frantic public, who’d been quite recently introduced to Elvis’s swiveling hips, shaky knees, and flopping, long duck-tail greasy hair swaying atop his bopping head on this new-fangled invention called television. An entire generation waylaid by Chittlin’ Circuit furies pulsing through the vigorous limbs of this whirling dervish snarling and mumbling strange vibrations broadcast on variety shows like the Stage Show, Milton Berle Show, Steve Allen Show, and the Ed Sullivan Show.
My mom, Phyllis, then a plucky teen, watched the Ed Sullivan appearance and was hooked, explaining to me recently she’d had a dissimilar experience than the one written in history – Elvis as this alien creature set upon the conservative, sleepy black-and-white 1950s. In the Bronx that night, Elvis was the kind of beacon John Lennon once mused, “Before Elvis there was nothing.” She told me, “He was one of us. He made us feel like he was a part of our group, nothing old but entirely new.” Never one to speak in glowing terms at any age about anyone (sans Grace Kelly – the woman loved Princes Grace), Phyllis mused to me, “I played that record so much, my mother begged me to stop. And then my friends came over, and we played it a few times more. Drove my mom crazy.”
Photos of the copy of that very record, my mom’s beat-up 1956 original, is shared throughout this piece. She bequeathed it to me sometime in the 1970s and it remains in my collection, although I can’t play it. Man, did she ever play the shit out of that thing. No stylus of mine is going anywhere near it. But it is history – American, cultural, familial history. So, it remains tucked in there just the same. “I remember when I got it,” my mom told me. “I ran and grabbed it off the shelf. I was ready to fight anyone for it. You had to go to stores at specific times, or they would be sold out. It was rare to even see a copy.”
To fathom the light-speed in which Elvis Presley went from regional oddity to world-wide phenomenon can give you the bends. Elvis Presley was a sonic boom in every sense of the word. It helped create a chasm in generations separated by song and style and set the course for endless discussions on sex, race, gender, delinquency, culture – and invasion of the American psyche with a new lexicon for figuring cool.
Its iconic cover, cropped from a photo of Presley performing in Tampa, Florida the previous summer, shows a man possessed, mouth agape in blissful song, his body a fluid kinetic wire untethered by mere gravity. There is a danger there in that he looks as if he does not care about anything other than the promise of that song.
The record inside lives up to its place in pop culture history. Enamored with three precursors to his rise, first Sun Records label-mate Carl Perkins, and the Black, gay, outrageously spirited Little Richards, Elvis kicked off each side with spectacular (“Blue Suede Shoes”) and serviceable, (Tutti Frutti”) renditions of their most famous work. He also made sure to include rhythm and blues giant, Ray Charles’s first hit, “I Got a Woman,” a reworked gospel cum raucous boogie-woogie, which Elvis had played at every single one of his shows up to then.
Other highlights of the album include a rockabilly Sun track, “Just Because,” wherein Elvis’s voice playfully bounces around the chugging rhythm effortlessly, “Tryin’ to Get to You,” a pulsing bluesy number he growls with blood-red passion, and a tender ballad, “I Love You Because” that shows off the unbridled range of emotions he would later perfect but with less honest solemnity.
Elvis Presley changed the look, sound and philosophy of this new thing called rock and roll. The album spent ten weeks at number one on the Billboard Top Pop Albums chart that year and became the genre’s first million-selling album. There would be more from rock and roll, of course, and you may have heard of those, but you could make a fair argument that none of them happen without this one. But that is a story for another column, so I’ll let Phyllis Campion have the final word: “When you played Elvis’s music, you had to play it loud.”
Celebrating Women’s Month (apt for this writer as both his mom and daughter celebrate birthdays in March), with a list (in no order of quality or sales or even adoration) of some of the most impactful and stirring opening musical statements by talented women of various genres. Although I’ll hang in the pop/rock/folk/funk/country/hip-hop territories, and this is not a complete list (remind me of what I missed and I’ll likely agree), I will not be a stickler for an actual debut album. This is the case for at least four of these artists, as their most rousing debuts can be found in a rebirth of their work that would come to define them. Most importantly, what are below are true expressions of what these incredible artists, and in some cases entire bands (and if a woman leads a not all-female group, that still counts here), will accomplish in their stellar careers.
Many of these albums were created in times when women were not expected to branch out as songwriters, lead singers, musicians, never mind producers and captains of their own professional destinies, while others had to overcome the industry’s stringent parameters on beauty, strength and authenticity in women’s music that men rarely contend with.
And it would be foolish to just place the albums below in the context of their times and social and political terms alone, as these are foundational creative efforts that add to the evolution of music for their genres and stand alone as excellent works that not only exploded at the times of their releases, but continue to influence and inspire artists and fans today.
Madonna –Madonna(1983)
Slamming club bangers from a pop icon, who’s underground debut changed how women, especially denizens of the sexually empowered post-feminism 80s, would be perceived, marketed and eventually sound throughout the rest of the decade with club and radio hits like “Border Line,” Holiday,” and “Lucky Star.”
Whitney Houston – Whitney Houston (1985)
The highest selling album by any female artist ever introduced the world to the extraordinary pipes of a young, fun-loving American sweetheart, producing a staggering three #1 singles, “Saving All My Love for You,” “How Will I Know,” and “Greatest Love of All.” It is difficult to translate how huge this record was and how much of a pop game-changer Whitney was because of it.
Lady Gaga –The Fame(2008)
The sheer audacity of declaring notoriety on a debut was both brash and prophetic as mega-hits, “Just Dance” and “Poker Face” scaled new electropop heights worldwide, setting the new glam icon for a generation up as someone who’s music was already primed for stardom.
Patti Smith –Horses(1975)
The godmother of the CBGB’s downtown NYC punk, next-generation movement, and the first of that wave to get a record deal, be played on the radio, appear on television, and create (with its iconic cover) the pansexual dynamo that enhances the music that will obliterate antiquated ideas of a woman as poet, rocker, and shape-shifter.
Pussy Riot – “Kill the Sexists” Single (2011)
Hunted, arrested, and made example by the Vladimir Putin fascist regime in Russia turned out to be a fine publicity stunt – which the band had a supreme understanding to the seditious nature of – like their infamous “guerrilla performances” expressing feminism, LGBTQ rights, civil rights, and causing general mayhem for art’s sake. This single recorded by original members, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Yekaterina Samutsevich kicked it off.
Aretha Franklin –I Never Loved a Man the Way I loved You– (1967)
After enduring seven excruciating years recording for Columbia Records, which tried to turn her into a sappy torch-song singer awash in strings, Franklin, sidled up to a piano to play with natural panache and escaped to the soul-based Atlantic Records that encouraged her to infuse her unique brand of gospel, R&B and a little rock and roll to launch an unparalleled Lady of Soul period with “Respect.”
Taylor Swift –Taylor Swift(2006)
This is country Taylor taking Nashville by storm by turning it back into the Music City for the pop world with chart-topping narrative-driven hits like “Our Song,” “Should’ve Said No” and sneaking “Teardrops on My Guitar” into the Billboard Top 10. The 16-year-old singer-songwriter with plenty of stories to tell was, as they say, on her way.
The Bangles – All Over the Place (1984)
Susanna Hoffs, sisters Vicki Peterson and Debbi Peterson, and Michael Steele comprise the finest all-female rock group ever. Fight me on this: musicianship, harmonies, songwriting, live performance, and one of the best debut albums of any gender. This one heralds the next decade of their hit-making prowess fueled by the raw energy of a punk band with exquisite pipes.
Fiona Apple –Tidal(1996)
The sexy contralto vocals spreads over trenchant piano, riding devil backbeats to ferry tempestuous lyrics that become a feminine tonic to the grunge movement with as much moxie as one can jam into a long player. A Top 20 hit “Criminal” and the MTV staple, “Sleep to Dream” kicked it into Grammy levels.
Lauryn Hill –The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill(1998)
Fresh from the Fugees and motherhood, Ms. Hill brings all the pain, joy, confusion and pure street grit to this sprawling debut of hip-hop/soul/funk. The older it gets, the more poignant this album lands, as it was her only one thus far. Personal and professional setbacks, along with an uneven touring reputation scarred what should have been a long and fruitful career, but taken as a one-off, it towers over the competition.
Patty Griffin –Living with Ghosts(1996)
The record company didn’t know what to do with Patty Griffin’s original demos that intimately heralded her sultry, countrified voice accompanied by only an acoustic guitar, as no one seemed to be able to top them, so they released them as-is, making this debut the finest DIY album by a woman ever, which launched a career of country/folk majesty.
The Runaways –The Runaways(1976)
Before the Runways, there were no all-female rock groups, especially none with a this raw, sexually explicit, razor’s edge. Lead singer, the 15-year-old, Cherie Currie backed by later solo stars like Lita Ford and Joan Jett on guitars, bassist, Jackie Fox, and drummer, Sandy West trailblazed the way for many of the bands mentioned here. But youth and the wayward lunacy of their manager, Kim Fowley, cut them down too soon.
Tracy Chapman –Tracy Chapman(1988)
At the height of slick pop dominated in synth/drum machine/digital sounds, butting up against hair-band metal mania, comes a Black woman with a deep voice playing folk songs on an acoustic guitar. No one seemed to need or ask for this, but when they got it, Tracy Chapman exploded. “Fast Car,” one of the finest compositions of the decade, famously resurrected in 2023 by country star, Luke Combs, sounded in 1988 as a seditious remedy and a return to the lost voice of the singer-songwriter.
Cheryl Crow –Tuesday Night Music Club(1993)
Former background singer and industry insider makes a fun album reminiscent of an actual Tuesday Night Music Club she attended in L.A. in which much of this material – fueled in a party/jam, milieu – was created. Sparked by laid-back groove the hit, “All I Wanna Do” the record would go on to win three Grammy Awards and set the course for Crow to become one of the most respected singer-songwriters of her generation and help anchor the groundbreaking all-women, Lilith Fair Festivals.
Alanis Morrisette –Jagged Little Pill(1995)
Like Aretha, no one in Canada knew what to do with Alanis, as she blossomed from teen-scene star into Grrrll icon for the 1990s. Camped out with songwriter/producer/mentor, Glen Ballard, who understood the 21-year-old’s desire to express her emotions without a safety net, the result was one of the biggest sellers of the 1990s with smash Top 10 hits galore, “You Oughta Know,” “Hand in My Pocket,” and the #1, “Ironic.”
The Go-Gos –Beauty and the Beat(1981)
Proving the core axioms in rock and roll in one monster debut, Belinda Carlisle, Charlotte Caffey, Gina Schock, Kathy Valentine, and Jane Wiedlin write, sing, and perform some of the catchiest pop music of the early 1980s, while proving that not only young men can act like wild animals and tear through tours in notorious splendor. “I’ll Lips Are Sealed” is a glorious pop/rock number for any time.
Britney Spears –…Baby One More Time(1999)
Bubblegum pop returns with a vengeance, as Britney reinvents the teen-girl-sings-and-dances craze for a new generation and explodes into the zeitgeist as a fully formed pop star. Hatched from Disney’s Mickey Mouse Club factory that would also bore Justin Timberlake, Spears wastes little time setting herself up for mega-stardom from the jump. Everyone knows or has parodied or hates or adores but cannot forget the title track on its inevitable rise to #1.
Tammy Wynett – Stand By Your Man (1969)
Although, like Aretha and Alanis, Tammy had a career, and in her case, four albums, before this, the woman who emerged from this record would solidify her place in the country music and pop culture realm as the prideful antidote to the feminist backlash against the life of a simple woman who loves her man. The fact that the title track, a chart-topping global smash, would arrive at the apex of the first feminist wave is something to behold.
The Sugar Cubes –Life’s Too Good(1988) Hello unsuspecting world, here’s… Björk! Whatever this diminutive, quirky Icelandic woman was offering is difficult – even now nearly four decades hence – to comprehend, much less describe in mere words. Her singing, phrasing, weird melodic turns in this post-new-wave pop/rock masterwork has stood the test of time and influenced countless female vocalists, although, who the hell is approaching this? No one.
Tori Amos –Little Earthquakes(1992)
A remarkable achievement in musicality, virtuosic piano playing, intensely unique songwriting, and painfully beatific honesty in its lyrics, this debut set a standard for a long and fruitful career of pushing boundaries and framing the core of womanhood’s sexual and political hopes, dreams, and fears. Every song on this record is an absolute gem.
Lana Del Rey –Born to Die(2012)
There are better Lana Del Ray albums, but you get none of them without this (I guess you can say that about all debuts). However, sleeping on this is a mistake, for it not only introduced the concept of the psych-rock genre she invented, but it set in stone Lana’s one-of-a-kind understated phrasing and acute sexual parsing, becoming the longest-charting album by a woman on the Billboard 200.
Adele –19(2008)
To my knowledge, the only debut to reveal the age of the artist on it, and I would gather the only MySpace demo gal to gain a record deal, Adele’s magnificent voice and emotional phrasing pushed two singles, “Chasing Pavements” and Bob Dylan’s finest ballad, “Make You Feel My Love” into the UK Top 10. A British balladeer with a soulful cadence, crashed pop music’s woman-as-sex-object-and-rebel-queen party to usher nostalgic elegance back onto the charts.
The Pretenders –Pretenders(1980)
Lead singer, main songwriter, Chrissie Hynde was a mid-American ex-pat roaming through punk-addled London, bouncing off the Sex Pistols and the Clash, when she formed a band to kick everyone’s ass. In my high school, there wasn’t a girl worth her salt that didn’t sing, “Brass in Pocket’ as if a feminine national youth anthem. In fact, after I blithely broke it off with one of those girls, she quite correctly, if not surprisingly to my non-plussed parents, blasted the song outside my house (ala John Cusack in Say Anything). So, yeah, 17-year-old me, take that!
Carole King – Tapestry (1971)
Until Whitney Houston came along, no woman sold more albums than Carole King’s pristine masterpiece in songwriting length and breadth. Former Brill Building teen prodigy gone Laurel Canyon hippie, pens songs from the heart and soul, invades the charts and wows critics. A perennial album of the golden age of the singer-songwriter with “You’ve Got a Friend,” “So Far Away,” “It’s Too Late,” and the landmark, “(You Make Me Feel Like) a Natural Woman.”
Mariah Carey – Mariah Carey (1990)
This is how big this record was out of the gate: a dear friend and songwriting partner of mine at the time, uttered without irony, “We all have to love Mariah Carey now?” Ummm… yes. And how we loved those pipes, that inhuman range, the ability to smile as she sang (you can actually hear this woman smile on these tracks), on her way to breaking pop chart records set by man or woman on the wings of four (count ‘em) four #1 hits, “Vision of Love,” “Love Takes Time,” “Someday,” and “I Don’t Wanna Cry.”
Hole –Live Through This(1994)
Okay, so Hole’s first official album is Pretty on the Inside, but anyone who knows knows that this is the introduction of songwriter, lead singer and guitarist, Courtney Love from quasi-punk hanger-on to Kurt Cobain’s wife to undisputed grunge queen. Joined by two women, Patty Schemel on drums and bassist Kristen Pfaff, along with lead guitarist, Eric Erlandson, Love emerged from the daunting shadow of her husband’s suicide with an honest and powerful collection of songs.
Olivia Rodrigo –Sour(2021)
A modern take on the pop sensibilities that have carried the youth surge of post-World War II to the edge of the new century from a 17-year-old singer-songwriter helped spark a rising generation of women to dominate this latest surge of troubadours. Her tender forays on the teen spectrum of heartache and confusion (hence the album’s title) wrapped in a genuine communicative voice subsequently became the first debut album to produce two #1 debuts on the Billboard Hot 100: “Drivers License,” “Good 4 U,” followed by “Déjà vu” and “Traitor” invading the top 10.
Amy Winehouse –Frank(2003) The throwback’s throwback that sounds like a young woman being blasted out of a jazz-adorned canon into the British pop charts bloated with boy bands and nubile flash-in-the-pans. It is not Amy’s best work, as she attested at the time, but it was refreshing to hear the come-hither, smoky rich contralto voice from another time and place, as the title of the album suggests (Hello, Sinatra!). Unfortunately, her soap opera tragedies and untimely death overshadows her music, but it nonetheless remains her true legacy.
Billie Eilish –When We Fall Asleep Where Do We Go?(2019)
Its creepy, alluring, funny, and catchy as all get-out. Nothing before or since has sounded like this – a stirring debut by two teen siblings (Billie and her bro, Fineas) holed up in a bedroom making sounds and songs that will soon conquer the pop world. Although her trajectory shot into the stratosphere, much of the naivete and blessed strangeness has since been removed from later works, and for those who were given this spectacular promise, it’s a tough hang.
When I was a kid, in my house, Barbra ruled. My dad loved her voice. And when I couldn’t think of anything to get him for a birthday or Father’s Day, bam! Barbra album! This one, I think, I got him, and then years later scored an original Columbia release. But if you want to hear a 21-year-old with a soaring operatic range with lightning quick phrasing and a biting sense of humor crush every song on an album, here ya go.
Pat Benatar –In the Heat of the Night (1979)
Where Billie had her bro, Pat had her boyfriend and later husband, Neil Geraldo by her side to assist in realizing her voice. – a powerful roar worthy of the best male leads. Eschewing new wave or disco, which was the genres on a roll in 1979, Benatar instead returned to good, old-fashioned sexy, punchy rock and delivered a bombastic debut featuring radio and MTV staple, “Heartbreaker.”
Regina Spektor –11:11(2001)
Independently released collection of exquisitely composed and arranged songs on piano introduced this New York City by way of Russia original to the world as a jazz/blues enthusiast aching to take those genres and package them later into a whirlwind creative spirit. Spektor would go onto to produce some of the most uniquely sounding albums of the early century and it begins here by her lonesome, unaffected.
Ani DiFranco –Ani DiFranco(1990)
Speaking of unaffected and completely autonomous music-making, here is the launching of the Righteous Babe empire cut on her own, published on her own, and pitched around early-90s New York City… on her own. The striking vocal cadence, the slicing lyrics, the feral, rhythmic acoustic guitar that sound like a band, changed underground sounds for men and women forevermore.
I rarely have the time to catch one music documentary when it’s released, much less three. But this past week-plus, I’ve had the pleasure to take in a trio of gems, all of them presenting the stories of worthy subjects – the life and music of Billy Preston, Paul McCartney’s journey from the Beatles through his years in Wings, and Elvis Presley’s late 60s Las Vegas residency. Each of these films tell their tales in far different ways, but all three are compelling, educational, and entertaining storytelling.
The music doc has evolved over the past decade into several incarnations, from a bevy of distended voices filling out the visuals (2024’s compelling One to One: John & Yoko, Todd Hayne’s stellar, The Velvet Underground from 2021) or using talking heads (Questlove’s dynamic,Summer of Soul, Netflix’s comprehensive, The Greatest Night in Pop from 2024 covering the “We Are The World” recording). There is the fly-on-the-wall cinema verité of Peter Jackson’s rightfully heralded The Beatles: Get Back from 2021, which restored countless hours of footage of the Fab Four’s creative process through painstaking experimentation of AI technology, and 2018’s Amazing Grace, which took good old-fashioned human elbow-grease to rescue the original film from technical difficulties that shelved the telling of Aretha Franklin’s 1972 live recording of gospel standards in a Los Angles church. There are tell-alls, Amy (2015) covering in painful detail the rise of tragic fall of Amy Winehouse to comprehensive four-hour band epics, Long Strange Trip (2017), an exhaustive chronicle of the Grateful Dead or Wu-Tang Clan: Of Mics and Men (2019) that tracks the story behind one of the most influential hip-hop groups of all time.
For the record: I do not necessarily consider a straight concert film a documentary, unless it includes interviews, backstory and perspective. Interestingly, I think Martin Scorsese’s The Last Waltz as both a doc and concert film manages to balance indisputably the greatest concert movie of all time with commentary but falls short as an inclusive a documentary as one would hope on the band or their times. Yet, the medium in the hands of a unparalleled fictional storyteller like Scorsese, who unfolds a sweeping aural guidebook to an entire era through the performances, and one of the directors of these three new documentaries I cover here, can artfully infuse a thematic edge to the process. I’ll elaborate later.
No matter their agenda or process, these three films tell a larger story about each artist in original and captivating ways. In two, the voices of the dead testify to their experience from random, edited interviews to wrest a tired narrative from the clutches of history, and in the third, a man in his eighties tries to make sense of a life lived in the spotlight he simultaneously strived to remain in and sought shelter from.
Let’s do them in order of my seeing them.
BILLY PRESTON – THAT’S THE WAY GOD PLANNED IT
Thanks to my dear friend, the inimitable singer-songwriter deluxe, Eric Hutchinson, who got the tix and invited me along, we checked this out at the legendary Film Forum three weeks back. Directed by industry veteran of film and television, Paris Barclay, That’s The Way God PlannedIt, titled after Billy Preston’s first big hit as a solo artist, chronicles the truly extraordinary, six-decade career of the Grammy-winning keyboardist from his incredible rise as a child prodigy on organ appearing on the Nat King Cole variety show through his touring work backing such legends as Ray Charles and Little Richard, which had him crossing paths with the Beatles and the Rolling Stone, both of whom he would record with and in the case of the Stones tour with, to his inevitable chart-topping stardom.
Barclay depicts Preston, as he was known in his lifetime, as a cheerful, ebullient personality that enlivened every session or show he participated in with as humble a reserve as could have possibly been displayed by someone so musically gifted. This was, sadly, a front for a person in great pain, which the film explains covering his conflicted childhood in Baptist churches joyfully singing and playing, set against alleged sexual and violent abuses from family members. This left Preston closeted from not only his homosexuality and proclivity for young boys later in life but displayed how folding into himself kept those close to him or his musical collaborators from seeing his trauma. This, Barclay surmises through dozens of interviews, led to Preston’s future drug and alcohol abuse as a kind of self-loathing penance.
The true highlight of the film is the archived footage of the dynamism of Preston’s amazing performances soundtracked by commentary from those who knew and loved him from family to friends and famous musicians whose music was enhanced by Preston’s work, George Harrison, Ringo Starr, Mick Jagger, and more. It’s quite moving to hear how deeply the usually reserved and off-putting Eric Clapton speaks so emotionally about trying to save Preston from his addictions, relating to his demons as a former heroin addict, paining to keep his friend from falling into ruin.
And this is where the complicated legacy of Bill Preston is written in That’s The Way God PlannedIt, ultimately, with crimes including drug possession, insurance fraud (in which he was eventually convicted and served time) and being caught time and again with teenage boys. The film doesn’t redeem or excuse any of this, of course, but in its coda and summation, Preston turns his life around, cleansed of substance abuse, to return from prison a man understanding his talent had always been his true refuge from the pain and sorrow he kept hidden, filling out his days not as a cautionary tale of someone who’d reached the heights and lost everything to someone who still cherished his music (the man had a ton of hits, many of which I bought at the time) and the roots of his culture to finally admit out loud his sexual truth a day before he died at 59-years-old.
MAN ON THE RUN
When I reviewed Tom Doyle’s wonderfully written Man on the Run – Paul McCartney in the 1970s in 2013, I was convinced it would make a great movie. I wasn’t thinking documentary, but considering the state of music biopics these days, I’m glad it went in this direction. Oscar-winning filmmaker, Morgan Neville’s Man on the Run, like his 20 Feet from Stardom (2013), which for the first time covered the unsung life and times of backups singers, neatly combines the music of Paul McCartney with a portrait of his life and times. Despite being hounded throughout his career as both a Beatle and a solo artist for not using his music as biography, as his songwriting partner, John Lennon was lauded for achieving, Neville finds that there was, indeed, a narrative forming behind McCartney’s most beloved pop hits.
Beyond using the songs as guideposts to McCartney’s resurrection from the ashes of his band’s demise – one that he tried like hell to keep together but was forced to abandon and then blamed for breaking up – we hear the 83-year-old composer speak candidly about what he was going through at the time deflecting the misconceptions of his lawsuits against the Beatles and his fight to reinvent himself as a solo performer.
The ghost of the Beatles, particularly Lennon, haunts McCartney during the initials days of the breakup in which the film does a terrific job of depicting with archived and recent footage of he and Linda’s run-down Scottish cabin he retreated to in order to heal his emotional wounds. And from this blessed isolation, Paul begins to make music again and most importantly reignites his passion for live performing, which the Beatles, much to his consternation, refused to do after 1966.
And that is the other interesting slant to Man on the Run: McCartney’s struggles to recreate in some way a band construct for him to once again find comfort to produce and eventually perform his magnificent songs. Choosing his wife, Linda to build this new group, a boldly controversial move at the time, and what turns out to be another spiritual connection like he had with John as a teenager, Paul pieces together as best he can a democratic unit. From its perceived humble beginnings, that band, Wings was a rag-tag experiment that never seemed to come up with a solution of whether they were there to serve the main man’s wishes or add viable input.
Neville masterfully takes us on Wings’ ascent from this underappreciated and poorly marketed unit to one of the most celebrated and successful (if not critically harangued) acts of the 1970s. And just like the Beatles neatly tied up its 1960s story, the journey of Wings spans the decade, wrapping up with the same anticlimax as his previous band by 1980. Throughout there are many twists, turns, and personnel changes – Paul and Linda, along with their kids, quite literally on the run constantly stitching together sustainable combos to present their music, beyond lifer, Denny Laine (late of the Moody Blues).
And as Paul McCartney remains the greatest living songwriter and one that with his long list of hits and albums has, when combined with his Beatles output, continued to enthrall us, having a portion of his ouevre – and this is some heady portion – dissected is welcomed by fans and the curious (is there still people unaware of this?) alike.
EPIC
Baz Luhrmann, yet another Englishman obsessed with the complicated balance of the ancient American deep south, its voices, its music, its traditions, its sins, its magic and the grotesque exploitation of showbiz, has put a new coat of glittery paint on Elvis Aaron Presley. Like the British Invasion before him, his reverence for the image and texture of Elvis as a heroic if not damaged figure of American myth is both inspiring and irreverent. The director already made an uneven if not entertaining biopic of the King of Rock and Roll, with 2022’s Elvis, and with the same fervor for meshing myth with reality and modernity with the stale echoes of American schlock, his EPIC (Elvis Presley In Concert) is a rousing tribute to a rarely examined portion of Presley’s career – his post icon-shapeshifter early mid-1950s period into the army and then out to Hollywood live performance era. What Luhrmann’s frenetically paced film (and I use that term adoringly, as I love his style), does best is circles Elvis as the ultimate musical archetype and exceptional stage performer, but despite what the trailers promised of letting the King tell his own story, he, in fact, tells Luhrmann’s story of how he views Elvis – with the same nods to painting Colonel Parker as the devil as his ’22 biopic did (the film’s graphics are the same, denoting this is a companion piece).
Luhrmann, in many ways, is in his films, something critics debate over incessantly – should we notice the filmmaker in the story he is telling? It is impossible for me to separate those aspects of filmmaking. Part of the draw to see EPICwas Luhrmann for me. But he cannot escape himself – the hyper-editing, tricky audio devices like repeating sung or spoken lines for maximum thematic effect or morphing old into new footage, as he as he did with music in his previous films like Moulin Rouge, The Great Gatsby, and the first Elvis flick, including mashups of traditional songs with modern sounds.
It is through this aural and visual prism that Presley becomes a man stuck in a time capsule, forever bedazzled in polyester jumpsuits with his awkward karate moves and sweaty scarves tossed to frantic middle-aged women. As he was in his many kitschy 1960s films, which Luhrmann drives home was Elvis’s ultimate prison, he traps him again in the garish ballroom of the International Hotel, singing his hits with a smirk and a wink. Hey, look at me when I was young and dumb. And that is always been my fuck-you! to the smarmy 1960s Elvis. That is until EPIC’s new footage found from the 1972, Elvis on Tour film set against his 1950s TV appearances revealed that Elvis always thought what he was doing was goofy, but not in a self-mocking way, but as a not-taking-this-too-serious way that ironically EPIC with its grotesquely over-hyped title suggests. Just as the bounding “Also sprach Zarathustra” heralded his highness to the stage bloated with three-dozen musicians and singers. But in masterful surround sound and through mesmerizing cutting, Luhrmann supremely resurrects what made Elvis special: he was a natural.
One key highlight from found 1972 cutting room floor footage is how utterly joyful and lost in the music Elvis always was and would be until his dying day. His most honest and relaxed interplay is during rehearsals with his incredible band, which in every incarnation during this period is fire. An incredible ensemble with the Sweet Inspirations singing their hearts out is mind-boggling stuff. This is what cuts through all the playful Luhrmann pomp, and it is where Elvis lived. So, in essence, he didn’t need to “tell his story.” His voice, his passion for the stage and to envelope song is what tells that story best.
Wrapping up my four-week exploration/celebration of the major Black forces in all genres of American music to commemorate Black History Month with more notable and laudable voices, musicians, innovators and influencers. These are the trailblazers and the legacies filled with instinct and guile, but most of all courage, as every one of them strived to overcome hardship due to systemic racism to bring forth the most original and dynamic music of the age.
King of Ragtime
The irrepressible and prolific genius that was Scott Joplin composed more than 40 ragtime pieces, many wildly popular for his times (the turn of the century), including “Maple Leaf Rag,” a recording so immensely ingrained in the spirit and movement of the genre it is still considered quintessential.
Joplin was not only prolific, he considered ragtime as important as classical music and made sure his works were performed in theaters as opposed to the more ubiquitous saloons. To this end, he also penned a ragtime ballet, and two operas based on the style. I was introduced to Joplin through the film The Sting when I was a kid (thanx for taking me, Dad), as his music, adapted by Marvin Hamlisch, comprises its brilliant soundtrack. I was then moved to buy the single for Scott’s “The Entertainer,” which was a significant hit in 1973, reaching #3 on the Billboard Hot 100, some 70 years after Joplin released it.
When I was working on my 2024 book,Revolution – Prince, the Band, the Era, Joplin’s influence and wide-ranging musical brilliance hung heavy on the likes of someone with similar drive and purpose for multi-level virtuosity as Prince Rogers Nelson, whose father had taught him to revere.
Emily
The beautifully elegant and impossibly hip, Esperanza Emily Spalding, or as those close to her call her, Emily, is one of the great musical trendsetters of our time, balancing her art in a mixture of modern jazz, pop, and Hispanic soul, enveloping their best attributes to create something iridescent. Known for her virtuosity on double bass accompanied by smooth vocal stylings that act more as an orchestral instrument than simple communication, she started out as a child prodigy in Portland, Oregon, performing professionally as a violinist in the Chamber Music Society of Oregon at age five. Expanding her oeuvre, she was self-taught on guitar and bass, eventually earning academic scholarships to Portland State University and Berklee College of Music.
For much of the early 2000s, Esperanza released intricately delectable albums of variant styles, both original and covers, illustrating her delicate scatting techniques and showcasing her fluid bass melodies. On her eponymously titled second offering, she broke through (this is when I first heard her in 2008), providing an eclectic introduction to the music that would invade the charts by her third album, Chamber Music Society (2010), reaching #34 on the Billboard 200, and earning the first of her five Grammys Awards.
Success has provided Esperanza a larger audience in which to share her social and political stances against human trafficking and racism, much of which ends up in Radio Music Society, her 2012 album that features one of her most striking compositions, “City of Roses.” She’s also co-written two jazz operas and still records today at 41-years-old continuing to compose, record, and tour the world.
Mr. Everything
The one and only, multi-talented, groundbreaking composer, arranger, producer and dynamic singer, musician and performer, Stevie Wonder grew up in the music that would shape, lead and eventually dominate his lifetime, from rhythm and blues, rock and roll, soul, funk and modern pop. From the mid-1960s to today (with an unmatched run of albums in the early to later 1970s), Stevie expanded the sonic elements of every genre, bending several to his will and sifting them through the multi-colored prism of his genius.
Starting as Little Stevie Wonder at 13 years-old, playing harmonica and singing with a confidence of a 30 year-old, he was eventually promoted for the unique element of his blindness by a burgeoning Motown Records but soon shed that limiting marketing ploy to begin invading the soul and pop charts while flummoxing musicologists by surpassing many of his predecessors in intricate arrangements and elaborately produced tracks, Wonder played most if not all the instruments on his recordings to create a sound all his own.
I can discuss the hits – and they are many and varied – but his run of albums from 1972 through 1976 remains a pristine expression of the musical, social and personal in one. All of them masterworks: Music of My Mind, Talking Book – the latter featuring the groundbreaking, “Superstition,” which is one of the most distinctive and famous examples of the sound of his trusty Hohner Clavinet keyboard. Then Innervisions, Fulfilingness’ First Finale, and finally the sprawling double-album, Songs in the Key of Life, all of which won the Grammy Award for Album of the Year, making him the only artist to have won the award with three consecutive album releases.
There is not enough time or space to cover the immense contributions to the American musical landscape by the inimitable Stevland Hardaway Morris, aka Stevie Wonder.
Jimi
The undisputed master of the electric guitar, Jimi Hendrix erected a sonic bridge from the explorations of his antecedents to an entirely new form of rock music. Wiping the slate clean and forging new territory for the instrument that forever changed popular music. There remains the demarcation – Before Jimi and After Jimi. And, in many ways, even “After” no one could produce, seduce or caress the sounds he approached from the mid 1960s until his tragic death at just 27 in 1970.
Having developed his early style of bombastic performance and feedback-induced mayhem while playing music in the Air Force, Jimi quickly became a sought-after player along the famed “Chittlin’ Circuit” that allowed Black musicians to connect with their audiences in the Jim Crow South. During this time, rich in woodshedding and expansion, Hendrix backed such lauded acts as Wilson Pickett, Slim Harpo, Sam Cooke, Ike & Tina Turner, and Jackie Wilson. Later he toured extensively with Little Richard and was a member of the Isley Brothers band.
Breaking free of the traditional blues/soul and early rock and roll of a previous era, Hendrix, performing under the name Jimmy James and the Blue Flames, began a residency in Greenwich Village’s Cafe Wa? but did not find an audience until he decamped to London, England and found a benefactor in the bassist for the British blues/pop band, the Animals, Chas Chandler. It was there, during the height of Swinging London that Jimi floored every major pop and rock artist, gaining a reverence unmatched by anyone, even the Beatles and the Rolling Stones during that time.
King
Synonymous with the holiday season, due to his classic rendering of “The Christmas Song” from 1960, Nathaniel Adams Coles aka Nat “King” Cole recorded an astonishing 100 hit songs during his near 40-year career. Making his name as a jazz pianist and the leader of the pre-war King Cole Trio, the first Black act on Capitol Records throughout the 1940s, he inspired dozens of jazz trios to follow. Nat would then kick off the following decade as a solo singer and part-time actor, eventually becoming the first Black artist to host a nationally televised variety series for NBC in the mid-fifties.
His sultry vocal deliveries crossed over to mainstream audiences in a time when Nat faced terrible racial discrimination on the touring circuit. Much of his notable output included one of the finest recorded songs of the era, “Unforgettable,” the playful, “Nature Boy,” “When I Fall in Love,” (my parents wedding song, although that one is by Johnny Mathis, but not as good – sorry, Mom), the tender ear-worm, “Mona Lisa,” John Lennon’s favorite song, “Stardust,” and the standard, “Embraceable You.”
But, of course, it’s Nat’s The Magic of Christmas – thanks to “The Christmas Song” that became the best-selling Christmas album released in the 1960s and sealed his legend. But if being forever connected to the most celebrated international holiday every year for as long as we’re all still around to do it, that’s a damn fine legacy.
Big Mamma
The booming voice and ample countenance of the great Willie Mae “Big Mama” Thornton established her as the most influential and captivating woman blues shouter of the mid-20th century. Big Mamma was a force to reckoned with on and off stage. A brawler from Alabama in the hallowed Delta soil that birthed some of the most prominent blues artists of the era, she was the minority trifecta – Black, gay, and a woman in the Jim Crow South, and learned early the art of survival and battle to make her mark, and what a mark that turned out to be.
Willie Mae was the first (and still the best) to record the Leiber and Stoller classic, “Hound Dog” – a song specifically written for her. To listen to her belt out those first lines Yooouuuu ain’t nothin’ but a hound dawg… is to understand the woman’s hurt, defiance and humor all at once. Her hoots and hollers on that track and many of her ensuing recorded material were the precursor to all the great ad libs of the soon-to-come rock and roll, soul, funk and hip hop.
Big Mamma also put the blues classic, “Ball and Chain” on the map, bowling over a young Janis Joplin, who insisted on belting the song every time she stepped on stage as a homage to Thornton’s image of immovable strength – something Willie Mae displayed for another two decades before her death in 1984.
A true original in an arena dominated by men, Big Mamma was a revelation and revolution all in one.
Prince
And now to the one-man revolution, Prince Rogers Nelson. And when asked why I gave my aforementioned book that title, one only needs to take a glance at the musical and racial barriers toppled by his thematic and colossal output. Composing, arranging, performing, and producing nearly every note of his singles and albums, many of them massive hits, he also wrote and produced for many other successful acts. But that is only part of Prince’s story, the rest is found in his dedication to stripping away labels, and allowing all artists, no matter the color of their skin, to reach beyond the music industry silos and reductive music critic frameworks to create something wholly new.
Signed to Warner Bros. records at just 19 as “the new Stevie Wonder,” he was granted complete control over his music, image and performing. He put together killer touring bands that worked their way up through the clubs, combining funk with punk and swagger with overt sexuality to bring his playfully salacious material to the masses. In this way, Prince was the first blatantly sexual artist to not hint or play with the subject, but face it head on without shame.
Although his halcyon period is the 1980s, with his triumphantly critical and financial successes in gems like Dirty Mind, 1999, Purple Rain, and Sign ‘O’ the Times Prince continued to forge uncharted paths to soundtrack films not of his own (there are four of those), like 1989’s Batman, triple-album epics, 1996’s Emancipation, and later create direct online releases. In fact, Prince became the first established artist to set a course for his independence by using the Internet in its earliest stages to present his music straight to his fans (whom he affectionately called fams).
Until his final breath taken far too soon at age 57, dying in his home/studio, Paisley Park, Prince made music that excited, challenged and even sometimes flummoxed popular music the way it always should be.
The wholly original American music– jazz, bebop, blues, rock and roll, hip hop – was invented, created, cultivated and evolved in the Black community, later appropriated (and I do not use this pejoratively, but it’s true) by poor Whites and then exploited by mostly White managers, agents, radio personalities, record executives, and publishers. The music transformed, as did America, from rural explorations into big city, big business ratings, charts, awards, etc. But at its core, the music of America, seeded and blossomed from the Black experience, continued unabated to excite, influence, and expand the art form into unimaginable realms.
Overcoming the horrors of slavery, America’s original sin, to lynching, Jim Crow, segregation, ghettos, systemic, economic and geographical racism, which were exacerbated by poverty, crime, substance abuse, and the cyclical rise and fall of deep-seated White nationalism that is as prevalent in America’s story as is its democracy, came the voices of titans, preternaturally talented and overtly revolutionary.
Over the next four weeks, I hope to concentrate on those towering figures of the African American musical landscape that sparked the rhythmic, melodic foundation in song, dance, fashion, language, and instrumentation for generations of every race to enjoy, explore and expound upon.
Lady Day
The sultry, sad, beatific majesty of Billie Holiday, the early 20th century’s finest female torch songstress, maintained solid footing in both jazz and blues. A standout in nightclubs and theaters, she could silence an intimate venue fronting a small ensemble with her melancholy voice or overwhelm a bandstand belting from her core before the celebrated ensembles of Count Basie and Artie Shaw.
In 1936, Billie turned popular music on its head, singing the provocative anti-racist song, “Strange Fruit,” a commentary on lynching in the South by a Bronx-born Jewish songwriter by the name of Abel Meeropol at Greenwich Village’s Cafe Society club. Arguably the most important song written in the American century, the ensuing recording of the controversial composition was at the very least the period’s most seditious and revolutionary musical statement by an American songwriter beyond Woody Guthrie’s “This Land is Your Land.” Billie’s performance that evening was an explosive expression of pained retribution echoed down the corridors of time.
And while she lived a difficult life battling drug addiction and suffering from poor business decisions, she managed to always embed in song a spine-chilling declaration of anguished beauty that never failed her.
Godfather of the Electric Guitar
Charlie Christian, the first national guitar hero, single-handedly popularized the electric guitar in the late 1930s, becoming a key figure in the development of bebop and cool jazz. An integral cog in the Benny Goodman Sextet and Orchestra, the first American integrated ensemble, his single-string technique combined with amplification helped bring the guitar out of the rhythm section and into the forefront as a solo instrument.
In 1939, Christian’s playing on Goodman’s “Rose Room” was an immediate sensation and today is considered a cornerstone of swing guitar, showcasing Christian’s mastery of melodic phrasing, triplet runs, and chord-tone improvisation; in other words, the template for electric guitar mastery. He was a national sensation and a massive star all before the age of 25, when he tragically succumbed to tuberculosis. Who knows what kind of effects his talent could have had on the next iteration of American music, which for the latter half of the 20th century was dominated by the electric guitar. But make no mistake, there is no Chuck Berry or Jimi Hendrix, Eddie Van Halen or really any notable electric guitar slinger without the sonic path forged by Charlie Christian.
King of Soul
Sam Cooke’s career spanned the entire scope of music. He was a ground-breaking singer, beginning in 1950 as a gospel standout with the legendary Soul Stirrers, then later in the decade when he became an instinctual pop composer that achieved unprecedented success. Throughout, he was a consummate and impassioned performer in both the posh, White, urban scene and an underground blues wailer in the sweaty, Black clubs throughout the famed Chitlin ’Circuit. In an industry rife with racist constructs, Cooke became a meticulous producer of his own and others work, a mentor and manager of new and raw talent, and a powerful and innovative record mogul until his mysterious death by murder in 1964 at age 33.
A resounding voice in the Civil Rights movement and as a young Black man having creative and business control of his art and image, Cooke stood tall as an undeniably significant precursor to the rise of Barry Gordy at Motown, as well as contemporary artists like Ray Charles and future multi-faceted Black artists/entrepreneurs like Prince, Dr. Dre and Jay Z.
Cooke’s musical output in his short time dominating the charts is Herculean and vast with seminal hits like the lush, “You Send Me,” the playful, “Cupid,” the infectious, “Chain Gang,” the stirring, “Wonderful World,” the fun-loving, “Another Saturday Night,” and the one that hit the year I was born, “Twistin’ the Night Away.” His most prominent contribution to the American musical and social landscape, “A Change is Gonna Come,” is simply one of the greatest songs ever written and performed, a thing of magnificent exquisiteness, which unfortunately was released after his death.
Sir John
And now to the criminally underrated and under-appreciated Johnnie Johnson, the musical genius behind rock and roll’s first poet laureate, Chuck Berry. His notoriety as pianist extraordinaire only scratches the surface of Johnson’s considerable mark on American music and the early foundation of latter 20th century pop music. You see, it was Johnnie Johnson who had the Sir John Trio that welcomed in an eager and ready young guitarist to give the otherwise jazzy ensemble a little St. Louis boogie, and so as Berry developed a style that would come to define rock guitar forevermore, it was Johnson by his side developing that uniquely legendary sound.
Berry’s most beloved and groundbreaking records from the chugging, “Maybellene” to the iconic “Roll Over Beethoven” (the first song to celebrate the new musical style), to the relatable, “School Days,” the seductive “Carol,” the era-defining, “Johnny Be Goode” and much more have the stamp of Johnnie Johnson’s piano driving the tunes as Berry grooves and noodles and scats his brilliant lyrics above them. All of Berry’s compositions were in piano keys, leading many to surmise that Johnson had more than a little to do with Berry’s songwriting.
Johnson would go on to record and tour with Berry for years before the two had a falling out due to Johnson’s drinking problem and undue credits to his work, which would rage on for decades. But make no mistake, there is no Chuck Berry as we know him – arguably the father of rock and roll – or even that genre without the talent and ingenuity of Johnnie Johnson and his amazing piano playing and musical foresight.
Queen Tina
Beyond her incredible voice, dynamic dance moves, commanding stage presence, and preternatural abilities to own songs, the Queen of Rock & Roll, Ms. Tina Turner is a symbol of survival and strength for women everywhere, as she overcame personal hardships and many barriers both social and racial to forge a career that included several comebacks, most of all her dominant return to the top of the charts in the 1980s, decades after breaking through with her husband, bandleader, and one of the pioneers of rock, Ike Turner.
The tumultuous and abusive Turner, inspired Tina’s early career while simultaneously causing her mental and physical traumas through several difficult years during which the two helped lay the groundwork for a genre of music they invented, providing a roadmap to the British Invasion and later the artists who combined unforgettable performance with a myriad of musical styles.
Aside from James Brown, no one worked a stage like Tina Turner, from her earliest days as a teen sensation well into her forties. Her vocal calisthenics in early performances of “A Fool in Love” circa 1960 is mind-blowing enough but her choreography with the Ikettes whilst dancing wildly on high heels and tight dresses is nothing short of super-human.
During her transition from escaping the horrors of Ike and preparing for her final splash upon pop culture, I saw Tina in 1981 open for the Rolling Stones in New Jersey. She was magnificent, and I still recall fondly her reinventing the Beatles’ “Help” as a slow, emotive blues.
Tina Turner was more than a musical giant and female icon but a force of nature, a Black woman who showed the way forward to not only survive male toxicity but thrive in a world set up to restrain her.
Funky Drummer
Hands down my favorite drummer of all time, Clyde Stubblefield was best known for his work with James Brown’s band during the Godfather of Soul’s most prolific and groundbreaking period of 1965 through 1970 in which he acted as the rock-steady backbeat to an incredible cadre of musicians that invented funk – much of it live in the studio as Brown barked out instructions and the band responded as if a left/right brain. The best example of this period resides on In the Jungle Groove, a 1986 revised compilation of Brown’s in-studio compositional process, which was built upon Clyde’s indelible rhythms.
During his time with Brown, Stubblefield was the backbone of perennial funk workouts, “Cold Sweat,” “I Got the Feelin,’” “Give It Up or Turnit a Loose,” “Say It Loud – I’m Black and I’m Proud,” “Mother Popcorn,” “Get Up, Get into It, Get Involved,” “There Was a Time,” “Ain’t It Funky Now,” and the brain-melting album, Sex Machine.
But, let’s face it, Clyde originated the most imitated, duplicated and, most of all, sampled rhythm pattern ever on Brown’s 1970 track, “Funky Drummer.” Used for decades by hip hop groups and rappers such as Public Enemy, Run-DMC, N.W.A, Raekwon, LL Cool J, Beastie Boys, as well as pop artists like Sinéad O’Connor, and Prince, as well as a host of other genres.
Clyde had a pocket style that was all his own – a powerful bass foot and supple wrists on ghosting notes that drove the band’s coolest jams and helped to inspire James Brown to new and unmatched heights. Quick hitting fills that never drew attention to his instrument, Clyde not only served songs and drove their purpose, but held his ground to allow others to lay down grooves. He was and is the OG, as much a partner in creation for James Brown as Johnnie Johnson was with Chuck Berry on his foundational rock and roll records of the 1950s.
In the late 1970s, before cable was a thing – at least in our home – we had something called Wometco Home Theater, which was a precursor to the HBO model of having closed circuit concerts and first run (and cheesey) movies streamed into your home. There was this separate audio box and a descrambler, and all that archaic stuff no one not old as hell remembers. Broadcast on there before the WHT switch-over was local TV – or what eventually became “public access” in the 1980s, where I got my second life in media – specifically Channel 68 out of Newark, the first station anywhere to air a barely controlled asylum called The Uncle Floyd Show.
Every night around six or thereabouts, without warning or context, would appear this extremely low-budget DIY variety “kiddie-style” show (pre-Pee Wee Herman satire) that had the look of a bizarre mix of a ransom video meets your neighbor’s cramped basement security footage. The damn thing was so Jersey, using the basis of the very early days of television (the innovative brilliance of Ernie Kovacs) that we grew up on in the 1960s (the jovial Captain Kangaroo), with the added irreverent and biting humor, music, and general mayhem of people screaming off “stage” and jumping in and out of the barely focused camera shots.
Bad jokes, ham-fisted songs, cheap toys as props, and a host of homemade puppets; I was smitten from the get. Hell, it changed my entire comprehension of words like entertainment, broadcasting, or presenting anything in traditional ways using this format forever. Uncle Floyd was my Beatles on the Ed Sullivan Show. Mind blown. World changed.
Floyd Vivino, a master pianist and songwriter, has a place in Profonde Musique beyond my being smitten as a teenager looking to break into broadcasting, radio specifically. The Uncle Floyd Show was extremely musical, infiltrating the underground NY/NJ scene seamlessly. I first became aware of the Ramones on Uncle Floyd! What? Yeah, the Ramones set up in that confined space and tore through songs like nothing I had ever seen or heard before. The show’s connection to the band expanded over the years, as both lead singer, Joey proudly displayed an Uncle Floyd Show button on his standard-issue leather jacket, and guitarist, Johnny wearing his Uncle Floyd tee shirt on stage. Eventually, they dedicated a song to Uncle Floyd, “It’s Not My Place (In the Nine to Five World).”
Later, David Johansen of the New York Dolls appeared on the show, as well as a very young and un-famous Jon Bon Jovi, who, as I remember it, plugged his up-coming gigs and gave a shout-out to a music paper I would eventually write for, The Aquarian Weekly. I often wondered if Bon Jovi got their Slippery When Wet idea from a sign just above Floyd’s piano on his West Orange set. Another NJ original, the Smithereens made their television debut on the show, and later British pop band, Squeeze, former Turtles and protocomedians, Flo & Eddie, Peter Tork of Monkeys fame, and so many more. I think the last big-time rock act who appeared on the show was Cyndi Lauper, long before she hit with She’s So Unusual, who found Floyd’s twisted humor expressed her frustration with traditional pop culture and where she would go with her straight-from the-New-Yawk-streets image as an anti-pop star.
All the coolest people knew about Uncle Floyd. John Lennon, the ex-Beatle then in the midst of semi-retirement living in the Upper Westside of Manhattan, and by all accounts TV-obsessed, was apparently such an avid viewer, he told David Bowie about it, who loved it so much that years later, as you might imagine when considering his interest in fringe art, ended up writing a song about it, “Slip Away” for his 2002 album, Heathen, referencing Uncle Floyd and his puppets Oogie and Bones Boy in the song’s first verse. Bowie then told his pal and sometimes collaborator, Iggy Pop, who, again, when considering Iggy’s penchant for chaos, adored it.
Finally, alternative-rockers from Wayne, NJ, Dramarama, made their television debut on Uncle Floyd, later dedicating their own tribute in song, “Work for Food,” a 1994 review of their early days, inviting Vivino to appear (very quickly – you have to really pay attention) as his Cowboy Charlie character in its music video.
I ended up meeting Floyd in the late 90s when I was working as a writer for the adult men’s magazine, Genesis penning features on sports, entertainment, cigars, shit like that. By that point in my career as a journalist and a local television personality, I had been ripping off The Uncle Floyd Show in every which way on local cable, hosting live sports shows, wherein the crew would shout from off-camera, and working as part-time camera man on my friend, Al Quagliata’s wacky Exactly 29-Minutes, which was a homage to all those barely coherent underground comedy excursions.
Interviewing Uncle Floyd for a skin-mag made more sense than I realized, as he was a big hit at strip clubs and men’s clubs, and had a ribald and deviant side to him that was equal measure charming and disturbing. And Uncle Floyd turned out to be everything I hoped he would be, funny, insightful, and refreshingly honest, as we kept chatting long after I turned off my tape recorder about his brothers, Jerry, a wonderful sax player, who incidentally adorned my band, Satyre’s original rough-mix album in 1987, and Jimmy, who played guitar in Conan O’Brien’s talk-show band for years. At the time, Floyd was still touring the clubs with his persona taking on all manner of subjects in his bizarre and endearing way.
After the show wrapped up 1995, Vivino’s career was a peripatetic swing through music, comedy, and guest appearances, mostly around the tristate area, where he remained our NJ treasure. He was always dubious of his impact on a generation that stumbled on his daily mayhem that he would record in the middle of the night over five-hour periods (a full week’s worth in a marathon taping). As we parted ways, I remember him telling me, “We had no idea that we were influencing a whole comedy generation, we were just trying to survive.”
In 2013, my only work of fiction, Y was published, and at its core is a study of What is Art? What constitutes “performance” or “entertainment” and what level of subversion there is in sabotaging that for nothing more than joy’s sake. Always on my mind when I worked on the manuscript was The Uncle Floyd Show, the memories of which reminded me that borrowing from the best of the Dada movement or cabaret hijinks and morphing it with late 20th century sensibilities can make its mark – if not a monumental one, but a lasting one. For those whose minds were blessedly warped by Floyd Vivino and his cast of crazies, we shan’t forget it so easily. As Hunter Thompson was quoted and remains my mantra to this day, “When the going gets weird, the weirds turn pro.” And so went the art and legacy of Uncle Floyd, if not a true original, an original truth.
The week I am writing this, “Purple Rain,” a song composed by the late Prince Rogers Nelson, who died in 2016 at age 57, recorded by his band, the Revolution in August of 1983, and released in June of 1984, eventually topping out at #2 on the Billboard Hot 100 in November of that year, has hit #12 on the pop charts. Its sudden reemergence is primarily due to soundtracking the epic penultimate scene of the popular Netflix series, Stranger Things finale. There is understandable chatter on how this worldwide phenomenon produced by Netflix – recently in a contentious battle over a controversial Prince documentary the network pulled under legal threat from the estate – managed to secure that song and “When Doves Cry,” which appears earlier in the finale, from said estate. But what I wish to discuss is the power and promise of the song itself and how its immense popularity has continued to resonate for the 42 years since its release, as the title track of a soundtrack that has sold over 25-million copies for a film that dominated the summer of 1984.
“Purple Rain” has become an American standard. It has overshadowed Prince’s wildly prolific nearly 40-year career, something he seemed to intuit, as many of his earlier masterful works faded into the background, while “Purple Rain” remained a constant in his performances up until his last shows. It is, as it was in 1984, a stirring piece of dramatic balladry, possessing the ingredients to any lasting piece of art: it moves people on both a personal and cultural level, as it reflects themes of redemption, forgiveness, vulnerability and conciliation. Musically, it’s a sneaky anthem, slowly building to euphoric levels, beginning as a forlorn self-examination of its narrator to slowly soar into an orgiastic celebration of spiritual enlightenment.
When Prince unfurled “Purple Rain” live for the first time – the actual version you hear today – at the legendary First Avenue club in Minneapolis, he stunned the Warner Bros. executives in attendance that night, many of whom had come to see what kind of film and album they were investing in. He also felled the film’s director, Albert Magnoli, by the nearly 14-minute performance of the song, so much so that he would take it as the movie’s title and demand the moment be recreated at its denouement.
There is no denying “Purple Rain” is a monumental pop music achievement, morphing rock with soul music, and even a tinge of gospel, a crossing of genres Prince did better than almost any artist before or after him. Its seemingly infinite hold on us is interesting on two fronts, which I cover in great detail in my latest book, Revolution, Prince the Band, the Era: “Purple Rain” is of its time and transcends it. We think back to the first time we hear it, and if we were young (I was 21 in the summer of 1984), then it takes us there with all the revisionist memories we attach to music, yet it still maintains its aural and lyrical powers as we age. The song, like all great art, evolves with us.
This is what the Duffer Brothers, the creators of Stranger Things, understood. The events of the series take place in the 80s, and from the very first episode, it celebrates the decade’s pop cultural touchstones, most notably Steven Spielberg films, which also have a similar effect on us. With each passing year, when we revisit Spielberg’s most beloved movies, (Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, E.T., Raiders of the Lost Ark, Jurassic Park) we are transported back to the first time these movies moved us while discovering new elements of their charm. Even though the ultra-dramatic scene in which the Duffers use “Purple Rain” takes place in 1987, the kids in the show hold the album in nostalgic reverence, specifically the young woman, Robin Buckley, played by Maya Hawke, who is one of two gay characters that come out in the series. Buckley, aka Rockin’ Robin, as she is a budding radio DJ, argues the group needs a monumental expression as part of an intricate plot to destroy the series’ main villain, because the cause and the moment demands music that reflect their heroic deeds.
The everlasting charm, if you will, of Stranger Things is the foundation of what makes “Purple Rain” a timeless classic. And so, we have in “Purple Rain” a narrator whose intentions are misunderstood – “I never meant to cause you any sorrow…” – that seeks to be understood – “I only wanted to be some kind of friend.” And that is what the Duffers present in nearly every main character in the series – misjudged outsiders, nerds, freaks, unable to blend into the real world and pulled into another one, The Upside Down. No spoilers here, you’ll have to dive in yourself (pun intended), if you’re one of the few who haven’t already, but suffice to say Stranger Things is about these lovable misanthropes finding their tribe to “save the world” in an alternate universe.
Prince, an insightful and world-building lyricist, used his songs to confront the upside-down bigotry, sexual repression, and spiritual upheaval in this universe, as well as any artist of his day. He pained over the lyrics for “Purple Rain,” adding and pulling verses from it, trying to best serve the song’s powerful refrain. Wendy Melvoin, guitarist for the Revolution, mused in my book that “Purple Rain” is ultimately a baptism, a cleansing, a view of the dawn as hope. The song’s drummer, Bobby Z, who’s steadily impassioned backbeat maintained the intensity of the bare arrangement, keeping it from sinking into mere melodrama, says at its core “Purple Rain” is “spiritual and inspirational that captures so much emotion.”
During the song’s miraculous third or fourth hook, the ooohh-ooohh-ooooh-ooooh part no one can resist singing, Prince implores the audience to express their understanding about a song that pleads for connection, “If you know what I’m talking about up here… come on raise your hands!” This thread from confusion to revelation in the communal expression of live music that fuses audience with song is the subliminal message the Duffers bring to the Stanger Things universe, a show ostensibly about otherworldly creatures and science run amok but is really about hearty souls on the fringes – divorced, abandoned, paranoid, aggrieved, picked-on, ostracized, introverted, queer, minorities who have been abused – forced to band together from bizarrely ominous circumstances to eventually find personal and cultural salvation.
And whether during dark times like today, the 1980s, or in the uncertain future of a world in which those on the fringes are perpetually threatened for their individuality, “Purple Rain” resonates. If anything, its message of forgiveness and conciliation is a reminder that the all-too human experience is stranger than any other thing.
Lunching with my friend, author, music journalist, and podcaster, Rob Sheffield this past November, he casually mentioned that for the first time a song topped the Billboard charts that was entirely human-free. An AI-generated artist named Solomon Ray, created by Christopher Townsend, achieved this feat with a chain-gang thumper featuring allusions to faith called “Find Your Rest.” As Rob rightly pointed out, this “digital stream” hitting #1 on a Gospel chart and not the Billboard Hot 100 was less intrusive to the greater public, but nonetheless there it was: a song made by a computer atop the Gospel charts. The most spiritual of musical genres dominated by a robot. A ghost in the machine” kind of thing.
There are many aspects of this event to discuss here. I will start with the obvious – controversial backlash. Of course, those in the religious community questioned the worth of a song reflecting God derived from something purportedly not created by humans, who were purportedly created by God. And, of course, this underlines the argument that man created a Godhead to fill a void in the human spirit, and in many ways, the advent of AI is yet another human creation filling voids, whatever they may be. But irrespective of technology, faith, science or philosophy, there is something rather funny if not strange that the first AI creation (it was bound to happen eventually) rose to the top triggered by the faithful.
You make the existential pun here, I’ll let it lie. I have bigger hurdles to traverse.
Next, there is the obvious dispute on whether artificial intelligence is art, or strike that, a creative endeavor. My dear friend, Peter Blasevick, one of our honored subscribers, is vehemently against even considering this. He sees it, and I concur on several levels, as non-music-talents sitting in their basement with a computer feeding “ideas” into some form of AI (ChatGTP, etc) and coming up with “song.” These things are everywhere now, but mostly in social media or YouTube and not “official” releases. One can assume that people who bought/streamed “Find Your Rest” and the entire Solomon Ray album, Faithful Soul presumed this was a person, as all songs for more than a century of recorded music has surely been. Does this matter?
Ray, sold as a Black Gospel singer in the mode of an Al Green with a heavy influence of blues/soul – I hear “Find Your Rest” as a track not unlike early Ray Charles, Sam Cooke or Aretha Franklin (all humans) that could slip easily into a secular construct. In fact, the name Solomon Ray, one could assume, is a clever mash-up of the godfathers of rhythm and blues, Solomon Burke (a human) and Ray Charles (also, again, human). So, there is some marketing acumen here that could be considered (beyond the whole computer-generated singer and song) a hoax, a con, or at the very least an attempt to mislead consumers.
An important side-note to keep me from being eviscerated: all the stellar artists referenced above, of course, are far superior to the robot and its robot song, but taste/critique is hardly the point here.
If there was no official announcement that Ray didn’t exist, then that is the most egregious part of this. Jesus, Milli Vanilli, a couple of model/dancers who were marketed as having sung songs two other guys sang in the late 1980s, were first vilified and then ostracized, despite all parties involved being human. And who is to say that you couldn’t have someone “front” a song sung by others? Phil Spector did this shit all the time in the early 1960s. Ask Darlene Love. There were 50 versions of the Drifters. What exactly is Steely Dan? But that’s for another column. So, you know, caveat emptor.
But just in case anyone thought Solomon Ray was a one-off phenomenon, the very week after my discussion with Sheffield, “Walk My Walk,” a white guy chain-gang blues by a faux band called Breaking Rust, reached the apex of the Billboard Country Digital Song Sales chart, hitting three-million streams on Spotify. Ironically, the music streaming platform released a statement this past autumn pledging “stronger impersonation protection for artists” that “features an improved music spam filter and intensified scrutiny” of what they deem is “deceptive content.” But these policies still allow publicly anonymous creators to post AI-generated artist profiles and music, which is, at best, a paradox.
So, is this art? Is this good? Or is this garbage creation by non-musicians and non-singer-songwriters and it is very bad?
Now, I’m old, so I will land on “I’d like my artists to be human and their songs to be created by humans,” but I am also not a head-in-the-sand afraid of technology cranky white-guy grievance dipshit either. I realize there is some “creation” here, and since I have always blathered on about “art being a two-way street,” if people are reacting to these songs one way or the other, then it is art. But I am also no longer a singer-songwriter, as my friend Peter is, as so many friends of mine are, not the least of which is my niece, the 22-year-old, Sydney Leigh, who’s been a pro for a year now and has new music coming out soon that she endeavored to keep clean of autotune and other digital “fixers’ that make the untalented sound less horrible. So, I could see how those who make song, as I make words and columns and books – another craft being invaded by the robots – might be threatened and aggrieved by these faux songs.
And this brings me to the modernization of music in the twenty-first century, where a fair if not major portion of our popular music is in many ways “enhanced” and “manipulated’ by computers. Not to the extent that it is entirely fabricated, but let’s face it, has been a gateway for this ingenuity. No way this Solomon Ray character could have comfortably infiltrated the music biz before synthesizers, drum machines, autotune, digital studios, algorithms, and other aspects of technology that have taken some of the “real” and “life” from our music, those little mistakes and foibles that make recording an organic artform.
In my new book, Revolution – Prince the Band, the Era, many members of the Revolution discuss Prince’s ability to effortlessly combine modern musical instruments with a human touch, antithetical to the bands of the period that relied on synths and drum machines to dehumanize music, Kraftwerk, Gary Numan, Human League, etc. Prince, perhaps better than anyone in the 1980s into the 90s, balanced the human element with technology, so much so that he had entire albums dedicated to this marriage, starting in 1982 with 1999 all the way through The Gold Experience in 1995 and his use of disseminating new music entirely through the Internet, the first popular artist to do so.
So, with the advent of two robots and their robot songs topping the Gospel and Country charts, what could be next? It won’t be stopping, that much is certain. Consumers of music have always “liked what they liked,” and invention and technology has always threatened the music business and musicians – from sheet music to radio, and then recordings, MTV, Napster, and on and on and on. The threats from the evolution of humans and machine are real, sure, but is it “pure evil” or “a necessary evil” of that evolution? The humans will decide.
One thing I noted to Rob in our discussion, as I have to many inside the industry, and especially Sydney Leigh, is that I can foresee a backlash to this from the younger generation. I already hear from Gen Z that they want real songs with real expressions, featuring those “mistakes and foibles” and they will seek those out, as youth once found be-bop during the big band era and rock and roll and rhythm & blues when “(How Much is That) Doggie in the Window” ruled the charts, and when punk revolted against the pretensions of prog rock, or hip hop was an antidote to the blandness of 80s soul, or grunge’s challenge to the pretentiousness of AOR pop, and, you get the point.
Where AI and robot songs and robot artists fit into the inevitable, “Cut this shit out!” I don’t know. Disco had its run. And then it didn’t. But it’s no longer coming, folks. It’s here.
Peter Ames Carlin, best known for his biographies on Paul McCartney, Brian Wilson and Bruce Springsteen, has created the ultimate look into the chaos, pressure and eventual brilliance during the making of Springsteen’s 1975 epic album, Born to Run, Tonight in Jungleland. Carlin expertly uses previous and new interviews with Springsteen, and a bevy of voices present for the album’s composing and production that would not only come to define the Boss’s oeuvre but place the record into the pantheon of his growing legend.
This is Bruce Springsteen faced with the very real possibility of being dropped from his label, Columbia, due to the middling sales of his previous two albums. He is also embroiled in management issues, which will usher in the era (still going strong today) of Jon Landau as his friend, confessor and champion. The album would also mark the entrance of two E Street Band stalwarts, pianist, Roy Bittan on piano and drummer, Max Weinberg that would calcify the “Jersey Sound” of Springsteen’s music henceforth.
With Born to Run, Springsteen transformed from a Dylan-cloned folk-soul balladeer into the living embodiment of The Boss, and Tonight in Jungleland takes us on that journey, visiting pertinent sideroads, as any story of this magnitude must. Carlin delivers both the harrowing and heartwarming with equal measure.
Placed in the context of Springsteen’s long and celebrated career, Born to Run was indeed a turning point and Tonight in Jungleland drops us in the middle of the songwriting, rehearsing and final recordings of a classic American musical statement. It is joyous tale of rock and roll primacy presented in an entertaining way that leaves readers with a new and essential understanding of not only the artist but his art.
I sat down with Carlin for a lengthy and insightful discussion before the book’s release in August. Here it is in its entirely.
jc: Before we begin on the book, you’ve written a biography of Bruce Springsteen and now this in-depth account of arguably his most important if not his finest album, how do you find him as a person?
PC: I like Bruce, personally, a lot. I think he’s really a cool guy. Even before I met him, I liked how he carried himself – his generosity with people, and I liked his progressive values. He seemed, for somebody who was clearly, by his own admission, heavily self-involved and into his own thing, as most artists are, that he was very empathetic. He really understood what people who met him needed from him, who he needed to be for them. And that was a huge deal because so many musicians and celebrities don’t have that bandwidth. But he came away from his own childhood and his own connection or projection of Elvis (Presley) and the musicians, the idols, he had growing up, that he remembered what it felt like to be that kid. And so, when he encounters people and they come up to him, he knows how to be, to make them feel seen and appreciated and not dismissed or made to feel foolish for being engaged with him and his work. I admire that in him.
Yeah, it’s a real art form for sure, because I’ve known a lot of rock stars who are not good at that. And they will tell you it’s awkward. It’s not natural for one person to know everything about you, yet you know nothing about them, and have a “normal” conversation. One of these people are on a pedestal. It’s just hard to live up to that, but he does. That’s an excellent point; he does live up to the iconic status that he has earned.
Yeah, he’ll have a drink with you if you catch him in the right moment. But I think it’s rough to be someone who people know that intimately through their music because you can’t have a bad day, you know?
He carries with him a great deal of the hope and the passions that people have for his music, which gets me to Tonight in Jungleland. First of all, as a fellow author who’s written a book about one album and one song, bravo on this, my friend, you killed it. It took me a mere two days to read this. I couldn’t put it down. It’s fantastic and gripping storytelling.
Oh, thank you.
You’re very welcome. That is the best compliment I could ever give a writer. Telling the story, that’s the whole ballgame. There was never a time you feel lost in this epic and serpentine tale with a lot of moving parts. The whole flow of the book works as a story, a story I knew to some extent – and I’m not a huge fan of this record, as I discussed before we started recording. Nebraska is where I land with Springsteen. For me, Born to Run has too much of that Phil Spector-y, large sound, but it didn’t matter for me, because your writing took me in there. I found myself rooting for Bruce throughout. It is fine work.
Thank you, very much.
You’re very welcome. All right, one of the things you told me, which is a little inside baseball, when I interviewed you for my Hey Jude book, Take a Sad Song – The Emotional Currency of Hey Jude, and when you addressed Paul McCartney, you said, “In my experience, I’ve done work on Brian Wilson, Paul Simon and Bruce Springsteen, and they all possess this amazing drive because there was an emptiness in them that could not be filled.” And that is clearly abundant in this book. And I want to specifically cite those little snippets you put in when you’re talking to Bruce at his New Jersey home recently, as he casually throws logs on the fire. Fantastic job with that. He talks candidly about his drive to perfection as a young man. What did you glean from that as a window into the man?
Well, first and foremost, it goes without saying that he’s miraculously talented on a variety of fronts – almost too many fronts! He’s a great guitar player, a great singer, an electric performer, and he writes great songs. It turns out he’s a great prose writer, as well. He can produce; he can do all the stuff. So, you have this “God given” talent, for lack of a better expression, but on the other hand, he has this incredible drive and work ethic. From the time he started playing guitar, he wanted to be a musician so intensely that he spent his entire teen years on it. Other people had friends and other interests. He would be in his room just playing the guitar, looking at himself in the mirror, trying to master his moves while he’s doing it. And then when he started working his bands hard, it was that same thing, and a lot of that I think stems from having parents who had strong work ethics and having a deep need for both mastery and control.
A great deal of lot of that seemed to flow from his response to growing up with a dad who was an upstanding and terrific person on a lot of levels but also struggling with bipolar disorder. So, there was a lot of chaos happening around the house because of his dad’s moods and the fact that he was undiagnosed and untreated. So, as a result, there was very little comprehension of what his problem was and no solution for it other than him basically putting his head down and fighting through his days as best as he could. And then at night sitting in the kitchen and drinking beers and smoking cigarettes, ‘till it was time to go to sleep.
His father was a very difficult person for Bruce to reach, for anyone, really, but especially for Bruce. And Bruce felt severely diminished by his dad’s inability to connect with him. And this set up this overwhelming desire to connect with people and to communicate. And also, he was strung between two very different senses of himself that he got from his family, his grandparents, who, as you know, his mom and dad and Bruce came to live with his dad’s parents when he was a baby, and they had lost a child when Bruce’s dad was young, and the girl was very young, she was five, and there was a terrible accident with an oil truck on the street outside. And that loss completely devastated the family, and, of course, devastated the parents whose grasp may have been a little shaky to start out with. So, they were very odd, outcast-types, and to some degree, very poor. Their house was crumbled down and everything. But when Bruce was born and came into the home, they greeted him like the sun god, because in their eyes, he was the reborn iteration of the child they had lost.
So, Bruce is caught between this idea of almost infinite grace and glory. He was “the golden boy,” he says. But also, that was bracketed by his dad and his sense that his dad thought of him as a loser and a waste of space because that was what he heard his dad telling him, even though really what his dad was telling him that he was desperately trying to get his son to toughen up and prepare for a brutal world that had done him in, in a lot of ways. He didn’t know how to deal with his mental illness, but despite his terrible actions, Doug (Springsteen’s father) did his best.
What you’re saying, in a sense, and you do a good job covering that in the book, is that Springsteen already had built into his DNA, this idea that you just forge ahead and you find the thing you want, which is what made him a star. And that brings me to the record at hand. In the book, you go through the first two records – on the first one, Greetings from Asbury Park, he’s Dylan, or he’s being at the very least Dylan-esque, and they’re telling him he’s “the new Dylan.” Then Columbia wants a hit, so he tries to write the “hits,” like “Blinded by the Light,” but it still rings of Dylan. Then The Wild, the Innocent, and the E Street Shuffle, the second record, which I found very fascinating, because I never knew this, and I probably should have, I had no idea they recorded all of it live, where they would go onto to piecemeal and build Born to Run.
So, when he gets to Born to Run, I have two questions specifically about the song and the record. Firstly, in essence, this record is his building the myth of Springsteen and doing it on purpose. The reason why I bring that up in the song “Born to Run,” he becomes F. Scott Fitzgerald saying, “I’m going to write the great American novel” and he writes The Great Gatsby and Springsteen, with a great deal of bravado, announces, “I’m going to write the greatest rock and roll song ever. I need to hear it, so I’ll write it!” That is a fascinating aspect of him in this book and on this record and how you depict him.
Well, I think having such a powerful early connection to Elvis (Presley) and seeing Elvis and how Elvis presented himself, particularly in the early days, before the movies and Hollywood and the degeneration of him as an artist, Bruce understood how important Elvis’s clothes were and how important the way he carried himself was. And, you know, when you follow the Beatles career, you see how crucial their image and the way that they presented themselves was and how that evolved in a matter of weeks or months. They would go from one look to a very different look, and when you see the difference between the Beatles – you know the famous photos on the cover of Please Please Me, the first album where they’re at EMI house peering over the balcony – they’re these sweet-faced young kids in suits. Then seven years later, they’re back there to do the cover of what was going to be called Get Back, (later Let It Be) and they’re these shaggy hippies with beards and long hair and hippie clothes and they don’t look anything like those cheeky kids, and it’s only been a handful of years!
For Bruce, even when he began his recording career, you look at the difference of who he is on the cover of the first album, where he’s got the work shirt on and the beard and the long hair, but he’s looking very kind of urban folky and that’s the idea, you know? I don’t think it was his mission to be “the new Dylan.” People called him that. He was obviously inspired by Dylan, but just as much by Tim Buckley and Leonard Cohen, like all the great singer-songwriters of the late sixties and into the seventies – that neo-folk singer-songwriter movement. He was the next step along that path. Eight months later with Wild and the Innocent he becomes the boardwalk rat poet with his buddies, the whole band, around him. And they look like a bunch of guys that just went surfing all day, which I think was true. (laughs)
They’re in swimsuits and flip flops, no shoes, and they’re looking sandy in the sun, and it’s a lovely photograph. And then when you get to Born to Run, he’s got the leather jacket and the torn t-shirt and the Elvis button on the guitar strap, which is prominently featured. And in nineteen seventy-five that was a big deal.
He was taking that original rock and roll iconography and updating it for the seventies, as opposed to the whole Woodstock generation, the hippie generation, who were previously like “to hell with all that.” They had lost interest in Elvis. He was the opposite of hip by the seventies – it was mom’s music or grandma’s music; it was for people that wanted to go to Las Vegas and go to a showroom, and that was not rock and roll. But what Bruce understood was, well, wait a minute, there’s the earlier Elvis and I want in! He’s gonna do the cold fusion merging of the visceral impact of an excitement of Elvis with the intellectual heft and excitement of Bob Dylan.
look at Springsteen from this period as a guy that’s effected by the Beats – Jack Kerouac’s On the Road thing. We all read On the Road when we were teenagers, and you could clearly see that Bruce understood it. The first record seems more Allen Ginsberg, very wordy, all this imagery flushing out. The second record has got that Kerouacian one or two lines that jump off the page, even though there’s still a ton of lyrics on Wild and Innocent. For Born to Run, he strips that away and now he’s writing rock and roll songs with big choruses and he’s bringing a little of that Elvis aesthetic in, but I believe after Born to Run, he sets a template for the rest of his career. I think that template is cemented with Nebraska, wherein he becomes more of the Midwestern working class character. He plays with that in Darkness on the Edge of Town and The River, (both records follow Born to Run) as well, but really goes for it on Nebraska. But it all begins with Born to Run for me. It is the beginning of the Bruce Springsteen we would come to know forever.
Yeah, well, I think he spent those first couple of years trying to figure out exactly what his creative identity should be and what his voice should be. Let’s begin with the eruption of words in the first album. In some ways that’s the sound of a kid who’s been pent up for twenty-two years and suddenly you get this shot to say anything you want to say and it’s like, “Okay, everything I want to say it’s going to come exploding out!” But eventually what you learn is, “Well, I got to control this a little bit.” Less-is-more becomes part of the progress from Greetings from Asbury Park, N.J. through The Wild, The Innocent and the E Street Shuffle and then into Born to Run. He was learning and figuring out that he had to simplify the structure of his songs and simplify his language and make his lyrics and his songs much more direct, and as a result he became a better songwriter to a degree, not that the songs on Greetings are terrible songs. I mean, there’s some fantastic songs on that album, but it’s a little like anything, you know, you’re looking for the connection, and it’s a little spotty here and there. But, you know, the thing about Bruce, what’s amazing about him, is that even at twenty-two, twenty-three years old, even his lesser songs are really interesting.
Now, I think part of the value of the shock of realizing that he was on the edge of being dropped by Columbia before Born to Run motivated him to find that song that could be “played on the radio” and maybe become a hit single. This leads to “I’ve got to edit myself a little better! I got to reconcile my vision and what’s important to me and the stories I want to tell to what the audience.” Making Born to Run there are those conversations he had with Mike Appel (his manager at the time), “You got to write a song that could theoretically get played on the radio.”
And Bruce is like, “Well, I love those types of songs too!” And Mike is coaching him to leave room for the melody and not clog everything up with a hundred words. And so, it was a little bit of a learning process. Who doesn’t learn in their early twenties, figuring out how to do their jobs?
To your other point about his “working class” evolution, I do feel that there is a lot of working-class consciousness on Born to Run, mainly due to the backdrop to these places – these characters he writes about, who are living and working and being, and somehow surviving until the night falls and they can be free.
The song for me when I was a kid that really pulled me into him was “The Promised Land” (from Born to Run’s follow-up, Darkness at the Edge of Town). I remember the first time I really heard and connected with that verse that begins, “I do my best to live the right way / I get up every morning and go to work each day.” I was the son of a college professor and it’s not like I didn’t have respect for work, I just didn’t see what the satisfaction of it could possibly be. My experience of work was “This fucking sucks and I want to go hang out with my friends!” But “The Promised Land” revealed an honor and dignity and satisfaction in a job well done.
There’s lots of unpack there. Born to Run is a depiction of kids of working-class parents who are going nowhere, so they want to get the hell out. Literally. in “Born to Run,” this is the mission statement. This is also true of “Jungleland,” and certainly “Thunder Road.” And when you get to Darkness, it’s like, okay, you’re accepting your fate that you can’t run away from who you are, but you’re still young enough that you could get out of this. By the time we get to The River, these are stories of real desperate people, many of whom had to marry the girl ’cause he got her pregnant in high school and blah blah blah. There are references to suicide on that record, criminalities on that record.
On The River?
Yeah.
No, well… maybe! That could be it, but that’s never been my reading of the song, “The River” itself. I’ve never been a hundred percent sure, to be honest. What the river symbolized is a place of escape as well. A great deal of characters in Bruce’s songs are forever going down to the river or some iconic place to do this or that. It’s funny you bring this up, because writing about these songs, I’ve been trying to work this out and then I felt like I was spinning in circles. Just when I think I have the ideas, it escapes me. I don’t even know if Bruce knows the motivation or even the outcome of these characters. This is the brilliance of his songwriting. We all see ourselves or people we know in them. They are like a connection to the earth or a connection to the inevitability of life.
Very biblical, yeah.
Yeah, it’s like the river keeps flowing and flowing and if you jump in the river and you end up in the sea then that’s the end of it all, right? I didn’t get the sense that the narrator is killing himself. Although, it is not hard to sense he wasn’t pleased with how things had worked out.
Right, right. Well, that’s where my mind went. So, yeah, it just goes to show you, I’m a glass-half-empty guy.
So, you’re just gonna hurl the fucking glass against the wall and get over it with, right? I got you. (laughs)
(laughs) I want to get back to the trimming aspect of Bruce’s songwriting you cover in the book. This starts with “Thunder Road.” You quote from the original longform lyrics that he started to cut down to make the song that we know.
It seemed like you were privy to a lot of early takes and demos and things like that. Talk to me about the process of going through that and is this the first time you heard these unreleased tracks, or had you heard them way back when you wrote your Springsteen biography?
There were some things that had been on bootlegs that were out there, so I had heard a bunch of that stuff over the years. But then in terms of all the takes and the recording stuff, I discovered Sony had all that stuff in their archives. And if I asked very nicely, they would let me listen to it, (laughs), which they did. So, I got to go into a recording studio in Midtown last June and listen to everything Bruce recorded for the album between April and July of seventy-five when they did the sessions. So that’s where all that insight comes from. It was just listening to take after take after take.
It was like four or five days, most of which were spent in the studio with an engineer who was rolling tape for me. I have both Bruce and Jon for their cooperation. They were like, “Yes, please let him do this.” It wasn’t cheap, I’ll tell you that. I had to pay for the studio time and the engineer’s time, but it was still worth it.
Absolutely. And it really adds to the book, as do your discussions with Bruce I mentioned. Take me back to this time with Springsteen at his place. Was it Long Branch or Lakewood?
It was a little bit south of Asbury Park. I can’t remember exactly where it is at this point. You know, the Jersey Shore goes on and on – I was staying in Neptune at the time, I had to do a few interviews. I had been back east earlier in the summer and spent a couple weeks in New York. I interviewed a lot of people there and did some archival digging and that’s when I listened to the studio stuff and rewatched a lot of the video that Barry Rebo had shot in the seventies. And then I came back and saw the See.Hear.Now Festival (annual Asbury Park music fest) performance and then just hung out for two weeks because I knew I still needed to talk to Bruce and Landau and a few other people in the band on their break from touring after the See.Hear.Now Festival. That was my moment to slot into their schedules. I stayed in an Air-B-B in Neptune. When I wasn’t interviewing, I was just writing, writing, writing, because I was kind of under the gun.
Your descriptions of those outtakes are precious. I love how Bruce motivates the band, or he motivates himself in the studio, jokes around. Marty Appel is yelling shit at him. I love that, it’s intimate. And then the interview with Bruce at his place…
Well, I had talked to Bruce and Jon in San Francisco in March of last year,
’cause I had had plans to go see a show. I only really had the idea to do the book in March of last year and I was catching up with Jon Landau and he said, “Hey, what are you going to do next?” And I was like, “Funny, you should mention that… I’ve been kicking some ideas around, but the one thing I’m most excited about is possibly doing something for the 50th anniversary of Born to Run.” And he was like, “Oh, I think we’d be into that.” Great!
So, then I pitched it to my people at Double Day, who I had just done a book with and they were like, “Terrific, let’s do it! But you have to have it done by the fall because publishing being what it is, it takes a year.” This was already cuttin’ a few months out of the publication thing, but they could get it in under the wire if I turned it in come October or November.
So, I just hunkered down and there was a lot of high-speed work. I assumed I had a bunch of leftover Born to Run stuff in my archive from writing the biography, but I was wrong about that. I really didn’t have much I hadn’t already used. I still had a big head start in that I knew all these guys and had written about them and knew how to get in touch with them all. But, again, having Jon and Bruce wanting to cooperate meant that all the doors kind of cracked open and so that made a lot of things easier.
Am I answering the question? I got lost. (laughs)
Yeah, no that’s okay…
So, I told Jon, “Look, I obviously have to talk to you guys. So, I went to the performance in Asbury, and then Bruce asked me to come to the after-show party and we reconnected there and I chatted with him for a little bit and eventually he said, “Okay, I’ve got a few things to do over the next few days, but let’s stay in touch and we’ll figure out a time for you to come and we’ll talk.”
On Bruce’s birthday, which was nine days after the See.Hear.Now thing, I just sent him a birthday text. It was his seventy-fifth, so it was kind of a big one. And he wrote back asked, “Peter, where are you?” I was like, “Well, I’m in Neptune.” And he asked what I was doing, “Why don’t you come on over? We’ll do it today.” And I go, “Dude, it’s your birthday!” And he goes, “Ah, it’s okay. The party was a couple of days ago.” So, I went down to see him, and we just hung out and talked for the afternoon. And then what you read in the book is the source of those conversations and a lot of that talk. Although, through the summer when I was researching stuff, if something came up that struck me as super surprising or something I didn’t understand I would send him a text like, “What’s up with this?” and he would write back relatively quickly and clarify it for me.
I love how during the course of this birthday discussion, he reminisces about his younger self, “Man, I wish I can go back there and tell that guy to calm down.” (laughs) I love that all the years of therapy, writing his memoir, growing older, having kids, seeing what it’s like to be a dad, going through all the stuff he had to go through with his therapy for his father and understanding that he battled depression, and then to look back to this guy who’s in the middle of this maelstrom and having sympathy for him was really great. And the way you described him during it with his flannel shirt and he’s throwing logs on the fire, and he’s real mellow sipping a drink – that juxtaposition of a guy towards the latter stages of his life looking at back to his younger self creating that life.
Yeah, well, you know, it’s interesting ’cause he’s very fond of younger Bruce, you know? He’s very…
He forgives him.
I think he just understands what his trials were and where he was and what he needed to do and how important it was to him, and also, I think, how much fun he was having, because those months and years of hard touring they did before
they really made it when they’re struggling, you know, and there are certain corners
of the nation where they do really well, and there’s big chunks of the U.S. where no one’s ever heard of them, and they end up “playing to the walls.” Everything was so local or regional that it depended on if they were on the radio.
For instance, they get to Austin, and the place is jammed. And they play like two shows a night for five nights. And, except for the first show, it’s completely sold out because they had been on the radio there. They go to Houston, same story. People fucking love them because they’ve been on the progressive radio station and the place is jammed. They get to Dallas, however, and there is no progressive radio, and so, no one’s at the show. And they’re like, “Ah, okay… huh.” Then they go as far west as they had ever been, except for playin’ LA and a couple of California towns, to Phoenix. And they’re thinking it’s going to be like Dallas – this is the start of a long process of winning people over, building that fan base, but they get there and they’ve been booked into this huge auditorium and it’s jammed because they’ve been on the radio there and people knew “Spirit in the Night” and “Blinded by the Light” and “Rosalita” and they’re like, “We have no fucking idea what’s happening here, but it’s great!”
It was that moment of hope in all the struggle that you’d think he couldn’t appreciate when he was younger. But he told me, “No, all I knew is that my dream was kind of funkily coming true. I was making a living as a musician. It wasn’t that great a living, but I was twenty-two, so how bad could it have been? I’ve stayed in hotels that are nicer than my actual apartment and I get to play music with my friends every night and it’s kind of great and I never had a problem with that!”
Right, right. Well, there’s the optimism, which is probably why the guy doesn’t jump in the river. (laughs) Bruce is a glass half-full guy.
Very true.
I have a couple of more.
I wanted to ask you about the Mike Appel and Jon Landau dynamic in your book. You did a very fair job in depicting that Mike might not have been treated well, but it was right for Springsteen to go with Landau as his manager eventually. I mean, clearly, in retrospect. Your thoughts about that whole thing… did you, I believe you talked to Mike for this book, did you not?
Oh, yeah.
And so, after all the lawsuits and everything else, how do you find his memory of it?
Mike is a very, very complex guy. And the thing that happened between him and Bruce was extraordinarily complex. And I don’t know that anyone necessarily thinks that Mike was really, you know, hard-done by Bruce, because Mike, in a weird way, in that sort of Shakeseparian characters digging their own grave and make it all the more tragic, was befallen by circumstance. It wasn’t necessarily his fault. By this I mean the contracts he had Bruce sign when they first teamed up were old-school contracts. They were way more tilted toward his end then they were towards the artist. So, he ended up owning a lot more of Bruce’s work and had more authority over Bruce’s ability to work than was ordinarily the case by the early nineteen-seventies. But the weird thing was his behavior and his commitment to Bruce was completely divorced from the actual contracts. The amount that Mike sacrificed, his willingness to dig into his kids’ college funds to keep the band on the road, his belief in Bruce, his willingness to do anything Bruce wanted, whenever Bruce wanted him to do it, those speak of an extraordinary amount of dedication and also his insane behavior with people when he felt that they weren’t adequately taking Bruce into account. You know, he was a screamer. He grabbed people and shouted at them on his behalf. Bruce kind of needed that.
But the problem was when Jon came in and was Bruce’s friend, then also the co-producer, he didn’t have eyes on becoming a manager, that wasn’t his thing, he didn’t want to do that. He was interested in the music and producing the music. But he also knew enough about the music industry to know that “you might want to take a harder look at those contracts” because Bruce notoriously did not read his contracts before he signed them. He was a kid from Freehold, he didn’t know from contracts. He knew from the look in Mike’s eye and Mike’s dedication. This guy is my guy. And they were like this for all that time. But Bruce grew up a little bit and got a little savvier. Then he had this connection with Jon, who was really smart and understood things from a different angle than Bruce did, just in terms of his background, his education, and his knowledge of how the industry worked. And Bruce eventually realized, “Oh, these contracts are actually a little bit fucking me over!” Plus, these deals are all about to expire, so now’s the time to figure out how we’re going to go on. And what he really wanted to do was to continue working with Mike, to continue having Mike as his manager and possibly co-producer, but on a handshake deal.
So, it’s “We shake hands, we look each other in the eye, and if either one of us ever wants to walk, we can walk, because that’s what a good relationship should be.” And Mike’s initial impulse was to accept that, that sounded fine to him because he knew and loved and trusted Bruce. But the problem was Mike’s dad was this kickass insurance executive and a real hard-ass and not always nice to him, unfortunately, when he was growing up. But Mike had one of those relationships with his dad. And so, when he told his dad that he was thinking of doing this handshake deal, his dad was like, “No, you cannot do that. The one thing you have on this guy is this paper. And if you throw that away, you’re screwed.” And so, Mike took his dad’s advice and that was the beginning of the end.
That was, ironically, one of the things that Bruce and Mike had in common, these hard-ass relationships with their dads, and it was interesting and tragic that essentially by taking his father’s advice, Mike screwed himself over.
Right. And in essence, Bruce loses a father figure that he had in Mike. It is Shakespearean or biblical in that way. The second part of the Mike story was Jon Landau. He comes into Bruce’s orbit by writing the famous quote, “I’ve seen the future of rock and roll…” And Bruce has always been coy about that, like, “Oh, that was too much pressure,” like the Time and Newsweek covers. But he was also fascinated by how Landau saw him when he was a rock critic. Jon understood Bruce and what he was after – moving rock and roll into another realm while, as you said, hanging onto its origins.
I love when you describe in the making of the record how Mike and Jon each form these different alliances on song composition and production. Mike and Bruce like this one song, but Jon’s like, “No, I don’t think that works,” or some part of a song. And then there’s another time where Jon and Bruce are into something and Mike’s like, “No, you got to try this!” There’s even a point where Mike and Jon are talking Bruce out of something. I loved how they keep trading alliances. Jon wasn’t like, “Oh, I’m going to stay close to Bruce” or Mike didn’t side with Bruce just to refute Jon’s ideas. All three wanted Born to Run to be the best it could be. I found that so charming and so inspirational because these people did not let their egos or their insecurities, which they were there ’cause you describe them in the book, let them affect this mission.
I remember when I was working on Bruce’s biography, he mentioned “the rule of three.” He repeatedly went through his life building this ecosystem where it’s him in the middle and it’s his grandmother on one side and his mother on the other or it’s Mike and it’s Jon Landau and Bruce in the middle, or then it’s Steve Van Zandt and Mike and Jon, and Bruce in the middle. He goes, “It totally works for me! I set them in opposition to one another!” And essentially what he said, this isn’t a direct quote, but he said, “I know that kind of sucks for them, but it’s totally great for me, because I can watch them fight and figure out which advice that they have I want to follow.” It’s clearly worked for him, if not for everybody else. (laughs) I mean, I don’t think it’s always fun to be in that position, but it’s part of the gig.
Is this your favorite Springsteen record? And is there a song on this record that defines the album? And, finally, do you think Born to Run is his finest album?
I don’t know. (laughs) I mean, how can you tell? It’s like so many of the records are different from others. Is it one of the best ones? Is it up there on the top rank? Easily. Yeah, sure. But you connect with records for a variety of reasons. The record I came in on was Darkness in nineteen-seventy-eight. I love the vibe of that record, the stories he’s telling, the perspective there. That’s the one that I connected with first and most powerfully. But, of course, I already knew like half of Born to Run just by listening to the radio. I already knew and loved “Thunder Road,” and knew and loved “Born to Run” and “Tenth Avenue Freeze-Out.” I mean, these things are on the radio all the time. And so, yes, it’s a great album. It’s a spectacular record. It’s probably in my top three or four of Springsteen records. But the thing is, his stuff is pretty diverse.
When you think about the distance from Greetings to Wild the Innocent and the distance from there to Born to Run, and then you go even further – you’ve got the folk records – the raw, dark Nebraska you’ve got Tunnel of Love, that was a record I really connected with when it came out, and I love a lot of those songs. There are elements of some of those songs that sound a little dated here and there just because, you know, he did it in the 80s. But his voice and his work had really evolved and grown with him as he grew and changed as a person. And so, that record was a really important step.
You know, you were talking earlier about his overarching idea that is captured first on Born to Run, this need for escape that you get from On the Road and you drive to that place that we really wanna go and “we’ll walk in the sun.” That’s a lot, right? And all those characters are hell bent on getting out of dodge. And then, and one of the things Steve Van Zant said to me was that he thought it was incredibly impressive that Bruce, having finally established himself in the minds of listeners and the culture as the guy who leaves on Born to Run, who hits the road and finds the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, at the far end of the highway, then became on Darkness ever-after the guy who stays because it’s his town.
He becomes one of the small handful of artists in rock and roll that the audience understands and knows where to find out there searching and then you instantly do a one-eighty and change everything about who you are to become the guy who stays. That’s huge, and really gutsy. Nobody does that.
People figure out who they’re supposed to be and who people want them to be and they stay that guy, Bruce said, “No I’m gonna change.” Because I think he realized that having found in his own way the pot of gold at the end of Born to Run – he got there in the fall of seventy-five – it was like, “Wow, this is equally fantastic and excruciatingly awful.” And so, he figured out a way to stay home, I guess, or he realized how important it was to maintain his connection to home and family and where he had come from. And that’s what I call “the credits roll” thing. He doesn’t talk about the end game in “Born to Run.” It’s just like, “We gotta go, it’s the travel, it’s the journey.” So, the end game. to me, and this is my half-assed attempt to connect Born to Darkness, the very title of the thing is that you make that travel and then you realize, “Oh, shit, I’m still me. No matter where I go – I’m still there.”
And so that’s why, even though I’m not as big as Springsteen fans as others, I get the arc. There is a definite arc to those records. He grows up in them. You don’t see this a lot in youth-oriented rock and roll. You know, there are shapeshifters like Bowie and people who obviously get older, and they change, but Springsteen grows. All those people who grew up with Springsteen, of course, people came in later with the spectacular popularity of Born in the USA, and that is an entirely different animal. But that whole early seventies fanbase who came with him, he grew with them. He’s telling their story. And that explains his fans zealousness about his music.
That make sense to me.
And again, just to wrap it up, you depict that idea really well in Tonight in Jungleland, because this album became his Rubicon. He had to cross this to get there. And that’s why I said before that he’s inventing Springsteen with Born to Run, the whole image of Springsteen, but he is in a way inventing the template for making records of where his characters will go, which I think is just as important for Bruce Springsteen as a man as it is for Bruce Springsteen’s music. His characters are so vivid, listeners end up relating so deeply to him.
Yeah, Before I met him, when I was working on the biography, and it wasn’t clear that I was ever going to know who he truly was as a person, beyond the person he invented, as you say, one person said to me, and it was very cool, he goes, “He’s exactly who you think he is.” And my sense was, “Okay, I bet he’s really thoughtful. I bet he’s really cool. I bet he’s really self-involved. And I bet he’s really complicated.” And all those things are true. And I don’t think anything I just said would be a surprise to him. I think that’s probably how he sees himself as well.
So, all those years of therapy and everything, I think he’s very comfortable with his own complexity and his own foibles because nobody’s free of those. He knows why he’s here and what he’s up to and what his work is and what his obligations are to his family and friends and his art. So, he’s very acquainted with all that stuff. He doesn’t have a lot of illusions about himself.
Very well said. And it comes through in your book. Good way to end our conversation. And, again, thanks to your publisher for sending it. Thanks for this hour talking with me. Best of luck with it.
Recent Comments
Categories