|
Aquarian
Weekly 3/26/08
BUZZ
ADAM
DURITZ OUT OF THE ABYSS
Counting Crows Front Man Battles Identity Crisis
and Serious Mental Illness to Emerge with a Powerful New Two-Act
Record
Saturday
Nights & Sunday Mornings will be the last Counting Crows record.
Not
because they're breaking up, but because who makes records in
this ghostly digital world anymore?
Apparently
the Counting Crows do, and their singer, primary songwriter, lyricist,
and spiritual center, Adam Duritz demands, "If the music business
is falling apart and no one is buying records anymore, and if
this the last record anybody makes, we're going out with a bang!"
Fifteen
years ago, in the band's debut single, Mr. Jones, Duritz pleaded
from the edge of oblivion; "I want to be someone who believes."
And now, after nearly two decades of walking what he describes
as a tightrope of fame and fortune while teetering on the edge
of a serious mental disorder, the same voice laments in a new
song, Sundays, "I don't believe in anything at all".
For
the better part of the past two years Duritz was debilitated from
a psychosis called Dissociative Disorder, causing him to retreat
into isolation and gain an alarming amount of weight. He stopped
reading, a purgatory for a Lit Major from Cal Berkley, and worst
of all, stopped writing songs and performing, what he describes
as his "touchstone" to the world.
It
was a culmination of what Duritz says was "one long downhill slide"
from which he has emerged after entering a program and receiving
the correct medication. He is eating healthier, dropped the weight
and wrote and recorded the gripping Saturday Nights & Sunday Mornings,
which he describes as songs about "dissolution and disintegration
and climbing out of the hole".
"Every
chorus of Mr. Jones ends with 'When everybody loves me I'll never
be lonely", which you know is not true," Duritz argues today.
"Winning a popularity contest cannot fix your life. You're supposed
to see through that in the song. The guy has a dream, and it's
a great dream; you should have it - go ahead and want to be a
rock and roll star - but that dream is not going to fix your life.
I knew that even then. Before it happened to me."
It
has been a long, strange trip from evangelical to agnostic; most
of it's details bleeds from every track on what may be the final
collective yawp from his band, the Counting Crows; the canvas
for his journey from endless night to a new morning. One Duritz
is not afraid to share in song or on the cover of another rock
and roll weekly.
There
appears to be a concerted effort to push the Saturday Nights
part of the record in your face, electric guitars, edgier lyrics,
and then unfurl the second half as a mellower, reflective collection
of songs.
|
If
you're an artist, you owe the truth. Period. That's all
you really owe. People can make judgments whether they like
it or not. For me, it's exactly how I felt. Maybe my style's
over-raw.
|
There
was no concept to it. The songs define it, and then you make it
work; but once it's there, there is no compromising. There were
people who told me to take several songs off this record, 1492,
for instance. "It's says ugly things about yourself like you can't
count on me. It's embarrassing, so get it off! Pick a more positive
song!" So, it says really ugly things about me? On a Tuesday
In Amsterdam Long Ago is embarrassingly raw too. I admit it.
It's ugly to them, but to me, its kind of the point of it all,
like it or not. Maybe they're all embarrassing. Maybe Tuesdays
is over-raw. Who knows? But it can't be over-raw if it's exactly
how I felt. If it's over-raw then that's who I am, so either way
is true. If you're an artist, you owe the truth. Period. That's
all you really owe. People can make judgments whether they like
it or not. For me, it's exactly how I felt. Maybe my style's over-raw.
Could
there be a song that you've written that would never be released
because it's too close to the bone?
No,
I don't think so. Too close to the bone would be the reason for
releasing it. That would be the point. You want to get as close
to the bone as you can.
What
about the second part of the record, Sunday Mornings?
As
my life changed, we were finishing up what you would now call
Saturday Nights. I started writing other songs, and I could
see this other kind of record as a companion piece. So we started
expanding on that while we were recording the second set of sessions
and at the same time learning how to record and arrange what became
Sunday Mornings. It was this one album that gave birth
to something else it is now.
We
had this great idea, it was cool, and it told a different kind
of story than it would if it were a shuffle selection of easy
listening songs. We were looking to do something different. Definitely
by the time we were recording Sunday Mornings we were aiming
at what we eventually ended up with.
You
mentioned your life changed. You've
been pretty candid about the period you've gone through in the
last year and half to two years, your bout with mental illness
and depression; and going through it in your work. Is there any
fear among artists that without a constant harangue or that constant
inner conflict, you can't create, or is that complete bullshit?
I
think it is. I couldn't write when I was at the worst. I didn't
write for years. It's not really depression, though. It's a different
thing entirely; it's a Dissociative Disorder. The world literally
seems like an hallucination. The world just doesn't seem real.
Imagine living for twenty years as if you were having an acid
flashback. That's what's been going on in my head. And it will
never stop. It's not going to go away. The challenge is to learn
to live with it, to not panic.
The
depression or anxiety comes when the world seems like an hallucination.
You tend to get a little fat and worried, because, you know, it
sucks.
The
truth is in the past year and a half I became complete debilitated
to the point where I could not function at all, but it was a long
decline. It's part of the reason I've had trouble all of my life.
But
as far as creativity goes; if you're a writer, you write. I write
when I feel things. Sometimes I can be very happy and it can remind
me of things in the past that are gone. I wrote On a Tuesday
In Amsterdam Long Ago a few days after Accidentally In
Love (Shrek II soundtrack/nominated for 2004Academy
Award). They're both about the same thing. Tuesdays is about this
idea that while I'm completely in love right now, which is incredibly
beautiful, what if it's just a post card, what if I'm looking
at this moment in my life like a snapshot of something that was
and now isn't a long time from now. It's a very sad song, as opposed
to Accidentally In Love, which is a completely ebullient
song about unabashedly falling in love. I don't know which of
the two I like better. It's harder to write about something that's
happy, maybe, but that doesn't mean you can't. It just means you
need to be a good writer.
To
write about those things is a lot harder, because it's harder
to be happy...for me. At a certain point you get tired of trading
your life for song. I've done it for a long time now, under this
impression that my life wasn't anywhere near as important as being
an artist. I'm not sure that's a very good decision to be continuing
to make.
The
song Washington Square reminds me of the Henry James novel
of the same name, mainly because it seems to describe this struggle
with identify and self-doubt in a world of wealth and privilege.
Well,
it's definitely about a loss of self, and it's about losing your
mind. It begins with a complete loss of sense of who you are.
I hadn't read Washington Square; so I can't really say
it relates to that, but yes, the first part of this record is
definitely about completely losing all sense of your self, and
the second part is how do you put your life together when you
don't have a sense of self. How do you go get it if you completely
let go of your life while trying to live it again? You don't know
how to do it, so you'll mostly fail. But that's okay. Life isn't
always about succeeding in everything. Half of success is in the
doing.
I
notice a theme of your work is to use cities as a metaphor for
whatever you are getting at, whether it appears as the name of
a song, Omaha
or Miami or in the case of this record, where city names
appear in almost every song and some titles.
I
suppose so. I don't use cities as metaphors so much as I tend
to write detail. I think I read once of Hemmingway that you begin
with one true thing and then you go from there. You don't want
to say; "I love you" as much as you want to say; "All at once
you look across a crowded room and see the way the light attaches
to a girl." The details of what's going on in the room, the books
on your shelf, communicate something about the way you feel. If
you just say, "I feel this way" it actually doesn't communicate
real feelings, because it's just the words that stand for
something rather than mean something. So I believe in writing
details and cities are where things take place. "I wandered the
highways from Dublin to Berkeley" from Washington Square
has to do with the two cities I left behind and ending up in New
York City and then having to leave there again.
You're
living in Manhattan now, and were there for most of the time you
wrote and recorded some of these songs. So seeing how cities are
part of your canvas, how did living in New York City influence
these songs?
|
Imagine
living for twenty years as if you were having an acid flashback.
That's what's been going on in my head. And it will never
stop. It's not going to go away. The challenge is to learn
to live with it, to not panic.
|
I
suppose New York effects me because I write about my life, so
any place you are will be a different tone than another place.
They all have an effect on me. I don't know where I can metaphorically
interpret how New York fits in. I definitely wanted to record
Saturday Nights here and Sunday Mornings in Berkley.
But a lot of it had to do with not wanting to leave home to record.
New York City has an affect on me, but it was also nice to go
home and record Sunday Mornings too. There's something
about the tone of Berkley.
I
began to dissect some of the new songs and noticed epilogues or
at the least hints of reprised lyrics from earlier songs; more
directly; "Now I'm the king of everything, and I'm the king of
nothing" from 1492, harkening back to Rain King from
the first record. Dreaming Of Michelangelo from the second
record. "This dizzy life" from Hanging Tree reminded me
of This Desert Life, the title of your third record. "The
girl on the wire" from On a Tuesday In Amsterdam Long Ago
and "I walked out into the air" from Washington Square
repainted the picture from Round Here, again, on the first
album. Were you thinking in terms of looking back, encapsulating
the last twenty years of your life and paying homage to the band's
legacy, or am I reaching here?
I don't really write in a calculating way like that. I don't
think things through. But then there is Michelangelo, which
was begun twenty years ago. I had this idea of Michelangelo lying
on his back painting the Creation: God reaching out to Adam, and
in my mind not being able to quite reach God. Obviously it's the
opposite, God has just touched Adam and he is alive. This is what's
happening, but in my mind it was always he reaching out and not
quite touching God. But I couldn't flesh this out. So the idea
crops up in Angels Of The Silences, but as I changed, experienced
more, and understood what the song was going to be about; it became
about the constant struggle of the artist to reach for something
divine, to create something out of nothing, which is the original
divine act; there was a void and let there be light, making
something out of nothing. Anything! Build a chair, make a song,
make a jump shot, but always try and reach for something different.
But to me I would never, ever be able to reach an understanding,
a feeling of satisfaction in it. Finally, what the song is really
about for me is that while you're spending your whole life stretching
out from something you can't touch, you forget to touch everything
else around you, and that I had become so divorced from the world
through this disorder that the only thing I ever focused on was
the music and it was the only touchstone I had on earth, and I
had lost touch with everything else, and that is what that song
was about, and now I knew how to write it.
I
will say the use of "Come on, come on," in Cowboys comes
from the nadir. He's lost his mind entirely. He can't feel anything,
and he can only touch the world through acts of violence, and
he's trying to get something to come into him and come out of
him, something to pull his life out of his numbness, and he's
screaming, "Come on, come on, come on, come on!" But, again, it's
a very different feeling than the celebratory "Come on, come on,
come on, come on!" in Accidentally In Love.
I
wrote Cowboys all in one night and I certainly wasn't thinking
of Accidentally In Love at that point of my life because
I was completely out of my mind and I certainly was not in love.
Having
gone through all you described, your disorder and identity crisis,
writing and singing about it, putting it together in art, is there
a sense that you've come through and the record reflects the failures
and successes as you described them?
Well,
I'm no doctor and there is no exact science for psychosis; but
it's scary. It's a difficult thing. You have to be careful every
day to ground yourself.
Take
it day by day.
Yeah,
but I'm thinking a lot further forward these days.
Reality
Check | Pop Culture | Politics
| Sports | Music
|