|
Aquarian
Weekly 11/5/08
REALITY CHECK
WHAT'S
WORTH VOTING FOR
A Final Demented But Well-Meaning Overview From
The Middle Ground
Better fare hard with good men, than feast it with bad.
- Thomas Paine
I've
been howling politics from the rafters, on stages, in living rooms
and kitchens, apartment stairwells and street corners, and in
every bar from NYC to San Francisco with friend and foe for well
over two decades. I have culled a paycheck to do so as a free-lancer
and in this space for much of it. I have reveled in its oddities
and absurdities, marveled at its prominent depths and smattering
of heights, battled against and with the best and brightest, worst
and dimmest, and occasionally even gotten involved. Much of it
has been either to cause trouble or to plant tongue firmly in
cheek and have a chuckle. But I have never taken The Vote for
granted.
Around
here The Vote is sacred.
I
have yet to vote for a Democratic nominee for president of the
United States. I voted for a Republican once in 2000. I did so
assuming the candidate would likely be a minor disaster, which
was proven understated. But it was never a vote of approval. I
merely did so to aid in the eventual defeat of Al Gore with whom
I had a personal vendetta. When I did vote prior, I voted Independent
or not at all. Every trip to the booth has begun from a point
of conscience and personal pride, exercising my right to choose
the person I'd want on the job or I would respectfully abstain
on the grounds that a vote for just anyone would incriminate me.
John
Anderson, Ross Perot and Ralph Nader never had a shot, but I slept
well with my decisions and laughed heartily during every minute
of Iran/Contra through Monica Lewinsky and so on.
Seven
elections, four Independents, two protests in absentia and one
George W. Bush were always followed by the obligatory laughter.
But
laughing along the sidelines will no longer be an option.
This
week I cast my vote for Illinois Senator Barack Obama. I do so
for reasons repeatedly established in this space since that evening
way back in early January when the candidate stepped to the microphone
in Iowa, having miraculously revealed chinks in The Machine, and
delivered the finest stump speech in more than two generations.
He has done nothing to shake my confidence over two campaigns,
one brutally contested for his party's nomination and one burped
up by his opponent.
What
this ultimately means is unlike almost every election I have followed
and commented on since engaging in schoolyard fistfights over
McGovern/Nixon in '72, the candidate I fully endorse actually
has a chance to govern.
How
the hell did that happen?
For
starters, I am pleased with Obama's demeanor, cool sense of self
and his overall decorum under the type of pressures no other presidential
candidate in the history of these United States has had to face.
He is the ultimate underdog; a ridiculously inexperienced, intellectual,
Liberal, northern, African American senator. Nothing close to
this list has come within a bullhorn's shout of the White House
in the 219 years we've been doing this. The fact that Obama has
beaten the steepest of odds has already been interpreted here
as victory.
Secondly,
I have been duly convinced of Obama's rational decisions at every
turn and a somewhat sincere attempt at formulating ideas and alternatives
to the madness that is our failed federal government. The only
caveat to this assessment is his repeated denials of hanging with
crazy people, which he most certainly has, and his choice of Senator
Joseph Biden, who is as crazy as they come and another abhorrent
Baby Boomer big mouth that thinks by simply showing up we're all
better for it.
But
let's face it; anyone who has ever served or lived for that matter
has dabbled in matters of crazy. Lord knows you agree with that
one.
Mostly,
I strongly believe that it is his time, his generation's time,
and his culture's time to give it a go. And so I shall vote for
him.
Unfortunately
for both the candidate and me, this is dangerous.
|
For
the first time, a major party candidate did as little as
possible to placate its base -- Right or Left -- and decided
to go his own route in his own way; equal and effective
parts grassroots, generational, technological, and oratorical.
|
First
off -- again, well established over the course of decades of printed
material and four published works -- I am a lunatic. Proud of
it. Think of the most radical, cynical, vulgar and unconscionable
ball-cracking contrarian and multiply it beyond your imagination.
This is yours truly on a good day. I am a miserable, spiteful,
vicious bastard the rest of the time. Pissing me off is not a
good move. I tend to become a rabid mutant when disappointed;
feral, spastic, and downright depraved when fed garbage and told
its ice cream.
When
I think something is already screwed, as it is 98.9% of the time,
it's easy to laugh it off, but when I am counting on someone or
something and they fail to deliver, I tend to hurl derision every
which way. It's best when I have no expectations. Ask my wife,
my family, what is left of my friends or any poor soul who spends
five uninterrupted minutes in my company.
This
is why I have found it far more pleasant to avoid expectation
altogether. Whether I root for a team or purchase the talents/labor/utilities
or heaven forefend, a product from anyone within our free-market
economy, I expect to be hosed. I presume to fight, scratch and
claw for every dime, right, or voice I attempt to infuse into
a myriad of situations.
A
good example of low expectations is my overview of the American
electorate and its previous gaggle of victors.
I
think most of what arises through the national political scene
is akin to a sad parody of futile embarrassment. Most of what
I have been forced to vote for, cover, or witness for the better
part of my 46 years of existence has more or less resembled a
steaming pile of horse feces. Thus, I have concluded that most
Americans, like most humans, are a puerile collection of damaged
goods, delusional egoists, or just plain stupid. Therefore, I
count on these people getting the leaders they deserve; corrupt,
lazy, and phony miscreant ignoramuses.
This,
of course, translates nicely into the philosophy that John McCain
is the perfect president. He is erratic, mean-spirited, confused,
and at times downright scary. If you were to wrap the American
psyche into a fun-loving ball and throw in a dapple of religious
zealot gooberism with this vacant-eyed running mate of his, you'd
have yourself a Clinton or Bush or Reagan or Carter or the usual
mediocre fare.
This
is why, along with he being a white, vaguely conservative, flip-flopping
military veteran; I have been more than amazed McCain hadn't wrapped
this puppy up by Labor Day. Most candidates with this list merely
have to avoid stabbing their mothers in daylight or kicking a
paraplegic to be elected, especially when facing the Obama list.
Apparently, somewhere along the line, voters thought whatever
the Republican candidate was doing trumped these sins, which tumbled
him into the unenviable position of being a symbol of the most
unlikely of defeats.
Barack
Obama is the first viable alternative to these repeated shams:
Inarticulate, carousing, half-cocked, plastic, quasi-religious,
social marauders, whipping up a frenzy of tired old proxies from
long-dead campaigns. Obama has not pulled these tricks. He has
not gone negative or petty or stooped to the latest feeble notion
to appeal to The Dumb, despite long-discredited institutions like
the NY Times or whatever passes for fading Sixties liberalism
these days.
For
the first time, a major party candidate did as little as possible
to placate its base -- Right or Left -- and decided to go his
own route in his own way; equal and effective parts grassroots,
generational, technological, and oratorical.
Maybe
it's why he is considered radical and new and represents change
and appears to some as un-American. Who the hell has grown up
in this fixed and damaged national political environment and could
aptly define someone uttering something smartly compiled and coherently
processed?
Well,
this weird angle worked like gangbusters around here and put me
in the strange position I'm currently in: The cozy place normal
voters have continuously settled with previous candidates, hope,
enthusiasm, and (gulp) trust.
Hey,
let's not get nuts. I have no signs standing on my property or
a bumper sticker on my car, and I do not own any article of clothing
with the man's name or face on it. As a member of the rogue press,
I did not donate time or money to promote the candidate or his
agenda. I certainly do not look for ideology in a candidate. No
politician could begin to identify anything that rattles around
in my head. It's best that way. I do not expect this candidate
to take on the entire establishment and turn this puritanical
country into an unrecognizable frenzy of revolt.
That
would be nice.
But
I'll take Barack Obama.
The
closest thing I'll get to a candidate with a chance.
Reality
Check | Pop Culture | Politics
| Sports | Music
|