|
Aquarian
Weekly 2/1/12
REALITY CHECK
JOE
COOL CARRIES THE TWO
White House to Play Percentages in 2012 Race
For
ninety interminably long minutes on 1/24/12, the president of
the United States played his hand. All that anyone needs to know
about the obligatory laundry list cum base rouser that usually
fills a final first-term State of the Union address is that it's
going to be the Summer of Populism for the most pragmatic chief
executive of my lifetime. This is how Barack Hussein Obama burst
upon his first campaign for the job he eventually won in the autumn
of 2008, and the way he has governed since. The White House will
play the percentages, weigh the margins, and use the Karl Rove
schematic for winning a national electoral election: Ignore useless
national polls and vacillating approval ratings and figure the
best way to get to the magic 270.
While
his proposed Republican challengers walk all over each other trying
desperately to shift Right, mainly because two of the frontrunners
have to distance a centrist to liberal past and get the party's
nomination, Joe Cool studies the trends of a thorny electorate
that has shown the kind of mercurial nature mostly exhibited by
the bipolar. In the last decade alone the national vote has gone
from geo-political to anti-war to wildly progressive to conservatively
entrenched to whatever the hell is happening now.
This
is why Obama's State of the Union appeared to be written by less
ideologue than actuary.
The
Numbers People are what matter in elections. They have the vital
information on who is available to woo, who is already on board,
and who is most likely to be courted. National politics is not
sport. An election, as it is at every level, is a sum-game; the
first one to the measuring stick takes the oath. Emotions, ideas,
credentials; these are the tools of the loser. Winning a presidential
election is about key numbers -- not the most, but the most within
the most. Think of a Salvador Dali painting sifted violently through
a Warholian blender. This is the Electoral College in action,
a warped contest of democratic synergy dominated only by those
who embrace nuance.
And
here's what Joe Cool's Numbers People read...
Currently,
the percentage of Americans jazzed about cutting deficits and
protecting the Middle Class tax burden by raising the tax rate
on the wealthy is 73.
Seven
out of ten Americans in this polarizing political climate is a
margin akin to a Hugo Chavez election result. This will get the
attention of even the most naïve Numbers People. As unpopular
as any proposed tinkering with National Health Care was two years
ago, which gave rise to the TEA Party movement, sticking it to
the rich is even more beloved. This also includes the trendy Occupy
Wall St. movement, whatever that is now.
Not
only has the idea of putting the squeeze to the wealthy grown
in popularity since the hilariously unnecessary piss fight over
raising the debt ceiling a few months back, but it has happened
on the insistence of Republicans. Normally, or more to the point
forever, Republicans have mocked deficit hawks as chicken-little
anti-capitalists. This has changed, and thus become bad news for
those who know that the only way to cut deficits and pay off the
national debt is through either draconian cuts to popular programs
or raising government revenues.
Election
year calls for austerity is shitty game planning. Ask Jimmy Carter.
So it's raising revenue, and the way this works is whoever has
the most is usually tracked down. Kind of like your rich uncle
when your band was after seed money for that P.A. you needed to
gig.
|
No
matter the national anger, the lukewarm base reception or
the perception that we're careening toward the new Greece,
19 gets Barack Obama a second term.
|
The
White House will be jacking up this winning formula to dizzying
degrees if half of what we heard in the State of the Union can
be believed, because 73 percent of anything sings the high note
to 46 percent approval ratings and 63 percent wrong-track polling.
Although
much of the anti-Obama stuff, a fair portion of it fabricated
by dumb-speak about a forged birth certificate, Muslim roots and
socialist leanings, is white noise to Independent voters; the
other key set of digits for the Numbers People.
In
the last three presidential elections not skewed by Ross Perot,
the Democratic and Republican bases equaled out at 42 percent
each. This means that roughly 16 percent of the national vote
is Independent, which rolled to George W. Bush in two elections
and overwhelming in Obama's column in 2008. Recent polls have
the Independent vote, including newcomers, which were predominantly
Democrat in '08 but a fair portion have flocked to Ron Paul so
far, ballooning to nearly 30 percent. However, much of this polling,
according to the best Numbers People, cannot be trusted since
there appears to currently be a rabid anti-government sentiment
on both sides of the political aisle clearly borne out in the
11 percent approval for 112th congress.
Still,
neither party can rely on the base to elect their candidate. Independents
remain the only source of gained votes, the individuals for whom
every attack ad, stump speech and debate performance will be aimed.
Finally,
Numbers People, for all of this talk about "people", are not as
interested in the human error of spastic belief systems and knee-jerk
political climate changes. The actual "winning" lies in the Electoral
College and its 270 votes needed to be president.
Right
now the White House has gone on record in surmising that with
Obama's fat-cat coffers and concentrated canvassing of Democratic
strongholds, the president is most likely to garner the John Kerry
votes of 2004. This is what gamblers call an even bet, the short
odds, the hedge numbers. This, according to Numbers People reasoning,
leaves them 19 electoral votes to corral. No matter the national
anger, the lukewarm base reception or the perception that we're
careening toward the new Greece, 19 gets Barack Obama a second
term.
This,
mind you citizens living in the non-numbers world, is an exacting
summation without an actual opponent, which appears to most assuredly
be either a rich robot or a raving lunatic; or if you are a student
of recent history; Michael Dukakis or John McCain.
So,
while the rest of the nation and the world heard a State of the
Union replete with political rhetoric and class warfare tactics
wrapped in a red, white & blue gunny, friends of the Numbers People
heard the cold clatter of calculation.
Carry
the two and hail to the chief!
Reality
Check | Pop
Culture | Politics |
Sports | Music
|