|
Aquarian
Weekly 12/17/07
REALITY CHECK
BASEBALL
THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS
Hypocrisy & Incongruities In The Mitchell Report
After
twenty years of reportedly ten percent of its players' steroid,
speed, drug, and hormone abuse, Major League Baseball's $40 to
60 million non-legally-binding, no-retribution band-aid to keep
the United States government from removing its atavistic, monopolistic
Anti-Trust Exemption came down today (12/13/07). Named for its
author and lead investigative council, former Maine Senator George
Mitchell, who was hired by the commissioner's office (on the payroll
of the collective ownership of baseball) and who
currently sits on the board of directors of the Boston Red Sox,
and did not include the co-operation of the Players Association,
including having no subpoena power or, incredibly, access to positive
drug tests, is one of the most extraordinarily useless endeavors
undertaken by a business policing itself.
Known
for its unabashed mismanagement by power-mad greedheads and ridiculously
paid pampered athletes, MLB took what the Mitchell Report decried
as a widespread drug frenzy on all 30 teams and narrowed it down
to the already exhausted BALCO investigation results and the hazy
recollections of highly motivated middlemen into a mere, to quote
Mitchell himself, "tip of the iceberg".
If
baseball fans thought they were getting the full story on two
decades of steroid and human growth hormone use they were sadly
mistaken. Mitchell's hands were tied. Evidence was spotty. The
Union stonewalled him. The league had to protect itself. He was
left to grab and claw for scraps, and scraps are what we got.
The
report accuses, primarily on the strength of testimony provided
by a convicted criminal and an FBI-threatened drug dealer, some
90 players of using illegal substances to enhance their performances.
Some of the claims are arbitrary and the evidence flat out circumstantial.
Most remarkably its results levees no penalty beyond salacious
rendering of mostly player names that have been more or less celebrated
as world-class juicers for a decade anyway. It also omits players
who have not only already failed drug tests but have all but admitted
through their actions, after displaying as much through off-the-charts
performance, that they are guilty.
If
there is such a thing as guilt, since many of these players juiced
before it was banned, enforced, or even acknowledged as technically
cheating.
So
in the end, this expensive exercise in innuendo and he said/he
said is at best incomplete and at worse a sloppy exaggeration
or outright fabrication. Begun with the best of intentions: Clean
up the game, like the Kenneth Starr investigation once attempted
to "nail" Bill Clinton on illegal land deals but ended with cum
stains, the Mitchell fiasco ends with half-assed insinuations
by two guys who worked in only two clubhouses in one city.
By
all accounts inside and outside the game, the list's compilation
of infractions is something like one to two percent of a sport
that only four years ago reported the failure of nearly 300 of
1,500 players tested for some kind of illegal substance. There
were still around 2,000 players not tested. And these tests were
previously announced! These guys knew it was coming and still
failed!
Oh,
and none of the guys who failed were allowed to be included in
this "thorough" investigation.
Ninety
players fingered for steroid and HGH use in modern baseball is
like saying a couple of hundred people died in the Civil War.
|
If
baseball fans thought they were getting the full story on
two decades of steroid and human growth hormone use they
were sadly mistaken. Mitchell's hands were tied. Evidence
was spotty. The Union stonewalled him. The league had to
protect itself. He was left to grab and claw for scraps,
and scraps are what we got.
|
The
wounded integrity of MLB takes another hit when it was revealed
that its offices were allowed to peruse the report three days
prior to its release, leaving more doubts as to whether a sport
that turned its back on years of performance enhancement mania,
and in any sane observation even encouraged it, has the balls
to come clean on its product.
And
by the way, the player's union did not have the same courtesy.
Player's Association head, Donald Fehr, who tried to block what
he deemed a disregard for fair disclosure, claimed later that
day he had less than an hour before the report was made public
to skim it.
Anyone
who even cares about baseball has to admit this was not a big
deal. If anything, this charade by Selig and the league, conducted
unilaterally and beyond the parameters of the collective bargaining
agreement with the Player's Association, could actually damage
the bottom line: Ending the Steroid Era. Lord knows it is not
concentrated over 90 players in a few cities unlucky enough to
be subjected to the hearsay of jock-sniffers, but endemic of the
national sports scene and a mockery on the history of the game's
records and legacy.
This
would be like paying someone a shitload of money to build you
a boat with no tools or materials and being surprised when it
sinks.
A
band-aid.
As
covered in this space two years ago (Everything
You Wanted To Know About Steroids But Were Afraid To Ask
2/23/05) the problem was well known by everyone associated with
baseball, and really, all sports, including players, owners, front
office personnel, journalists, and networks covering the sport
for a long time. Occasionally, articles in prominent periodicals
like Sport Illustrated and other scattered journalistic investigations
shed light on a culture of steroid abuse from high school through
professional sports. But in 1994 when the issue came up in the
collective bargaining farce run by commissioner Bud Selig, (much
of which is covered in my second book, Fear
No Art), after the owners, under the direction of Selig,
staged a lock-out and closed down the sport, canceling the World
Series, it was not only ignored but thrown out as a possible deterrent
to "figuring financial concerns".
Those
concerns were again addressed in the late nineties as players
jacked on steroids and other forms of doping began to obliterate
records and enthrall the nation with home run chases. Yet glowing
books were written. Sonnets of heroism were penned. Statues of
immortals were erected.
Baseball,
prior in 1994, went from a distant third in popularity among professional
sports and probably fifth or sixth overall. Its resurgence in
what is now reported to be a $6 billion industry is not because
of integrity, jack, but players doing amazing things. A preponderance
of which were enhanced by some kind of substance.
Now
the sport, its questionably credible commissioner, and a private
council paid for by the owners, who have a $6 billion interest
invested in this business, ask us to look to the future and put
it all behind us?
Fuck
that.
Aside
from burying that jackass Roger Clemens, all this report did was
give you the smallest glimpse into an impregnable landscape of
sordid details and complicated mazes of systematic paranoia that
exists in the modern professional athlete. A manic rage to achieve
greatness no matter the consequence, no matter the cost is reviewed
nicely.
By
day's end there were rumblings of more names coming from further
investigations and new evidence on the horizon. And Roger Clemens,
the era's greatest pitcher joining the era's greatest hitter,
Barry Bonds in infamy is now calling the report "slanderous".
Name
calling. Vague recommendations. Wasted time. Money pissed away.
Just to get down on paper the smallest percentage of the ultimate
goal, a goal that is ambiguous and self-serving, leaving room
to continue business as usual.
Yes,
well, a congressman was in charge and a multi-billion dollar industry
bankrolled it. That's sounds about right.
Carry
on.
Reality
Check | Pop Culture | Politics
| Sports | Music
|